Active Users:655 Time:18/09/2026 09:54:48 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
we witnessed couldn't even make a small cup turn in an hour.

it is my recolection/impression that they were converting goblets, and those can be quite sizable. Especially when you are talking something that started life as cast iron, and it is the volume of the material that is important.

Considering most Warders we've seen don't seem to even wear armor ... They seem to prefer mobility over the protection

You are correct, warders do prefer mobility over carying 200 pounds of armor around, but C armor wouldn't be 200lbs. One of the 2 key advantages of C as a armor material is that it is inherantly unbreakable. paper thin C has the same protective value as C 50 feet thick. Because of this fantastical feature, C armor would/should be incredibly light, Lighter even than the leather that most warders wear now because you do not need thickness for either protection of structural strength.

Why would an Aes Sedai even consider undertaking such a process?

Postponing the agonizing crippling sorrow and longing (from the severed bond) for a dead warder comes to mind.

I'm not saying it would be useless, but there clearly isn't need for such armor as it would only really be effective under certain circumstances.

Circumstances like any time blades are bared, situation warders tend to end up in fairly regularly, or better yet a once in an Age huge battle between good and evil... think we might see one of those?

And really how much more effective would cuendillar armor be compared to steel?

See below, it would be incredibly effective. Same mobility, massive increase in protection. It would be like going into battle bearing live steel, while all your opponents were using lathe practice wands.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1808 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1266 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 658 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1204 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1274 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 637 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1172 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 1296 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1350 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1130 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 692 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1152 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1301 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 579 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1399 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1197 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1178 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1179 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1192 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1265 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1132 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1181 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1073 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1245 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1049 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1055 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1190 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1068 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 1036 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 719 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1152 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1135 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1099 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1205 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1081 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 1052 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 1100 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1182 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1175 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1104 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 1053 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1221 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 1056 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1233 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1374 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1176 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 1077 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 1045 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 1054 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1224 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1070 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1071 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1234 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1099 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1073 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1204 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 653 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes