Active Users:317 Time:02/05/2024 06:00:35 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy Send a noteboard - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM
But I'll recap the general jist of what was said:

-Cuendillar is presumably completely inflexible, therefore we'd need to make it similar to chain-mail, i.e. links, to make small pieces that are flexible with respect to each other.

-This appears difficult, because the individual cuendillar pieces could not be touching when merged together (although I'm sure they could simply interleave flows of Air and it wouldn't be all that hard).

-The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1325 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 771 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 414 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 682 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 762 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 372 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 660 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 816 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 876 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 667 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 416 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 654 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 759 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 349 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 843 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 713 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 678 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 682 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 726 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 776 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 618 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 660 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 584 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 728 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 567 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 578 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 669 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 570 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 567 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 494 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 657 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 608 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 627 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 724 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 575 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 585 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 613 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 661 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 666 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 624 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 531 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 667 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 533 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 665 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 842 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 624 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 559 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 573 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 529 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 681 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 576 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 578 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 736 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 574 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 546 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 612 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 390 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes