Active Users:304 Time:04/05/2024 03:21:44 PM
*Shrug* darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
We aren't going to come to an agreement on this ... A set of armor is all dandy I've said a million times that I simply think the value of the armor is not worth the effort of creating it. At the moment there are only a handful people in the world that can make cuendillar and the process has proven to take a lot of time for all but the very best. Perhaps this will change at some point, but judging from the relatively small number of cuendillar objects that existed from the AoL it seems likely that the Talent is rare. Given that they clearly did not make armor of cuendillar during the War of Power when they had much deeper resources it seems logical that if there was benefit to it they would have done it.

As for weapons, arrows would be very useful and advanced forging methods for blades already seem to exist in the WOT universe based on the swords we've seen ... which can ensure a cuendillar sword is as sharp as necessary and since it will never lose that edge there is not need to sharpen it again. I still think it's a waste of effort to create any of these things when the nature of the world is already beginning to change and the OP is being used regularly in battle and war machines are becoming common place and the days of the individual swordsman are coming to a close. Long range weapons will only get more sophisticated thanks to Rands universities.

Also we have zero indication that cuendillar is lighter than the iron it starts out as so your supposition that the armor would be light weight is not certain by any means.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1326 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 772 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 414 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 682 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 763 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 373 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 660 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 877 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 667 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 417 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 655 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 760 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 350 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 843 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 714 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 678 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 683 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 727 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 777 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 619 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 661 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 585 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 729 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 568 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 579 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 669 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 571 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 568 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 495 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 658 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 609 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 627 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 725 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 576 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 586 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 661 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 666 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 624 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 532 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 667 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 533 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 666 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 843 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 574 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 529 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 682 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 577 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 579 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 737 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 575 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 547 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 612 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 390 Views

Reply to Message