Active Users:245 Time:25/04/2024 05:41:32 AM
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM
The plates deforing is what is called a "bad thing". The armor works by preventing the concentrated impact of the weapon from reaching the soft body underneath. This is accomplished by several means, none of which include denting the armor. The short (and incomplete) description is that it takes the impact from the weapon, and spreads the force across the surface area of the plate. If the plate deforms, the force is no longer spread. I can go into the physics of it, or you can just believe me.</quote

a) I'm enjoying this argument, but try not to be so condescending.

b) While a larger area to spread the pressure over means less force, a denting armor is similar to the "crumple zone" on cars, which is what I think Lorraine is getting at. The denting armor means that the contact lasts longer, so by deltap = Ft, there is less force imparted by the same swing.
At last, I have an apostrophe!

*MySmiley*
Foil fencers Dance the Spears. Or, at least, the foils.

Too stubborn to remove that extraneous *MySmiley*

~The Decapitator~
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1322 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 767 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 413 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 679 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 758 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 371 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 655 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 872 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 664 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 414 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 650 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 755 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 347 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 838 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 710 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 675 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 679 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 723 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 773 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 615 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 657 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 581 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 725 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 564 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 574 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 665 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 566 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 564 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 492 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 653 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 604 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 624 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 721 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 572 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 582 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 657 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 663 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 621 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 528 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 664 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 530 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 660 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 839 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 570 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 525 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 678 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 573 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 575 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 730 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 571 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 542 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 609 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 389 Views

Reply to Message