Active Users:628 Time:31/10/2026 09:07:23 AM
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM
Full plate armor consists of multiple armor plates connected together either with metal connectors or leather toggles. Converting each plate individually once shaped and then connecting them into a suit as normal shouldn't pose any problem at all.

As with any armor, you would still need the padding layers beneath the armor shell, something that has been forgotten by many conventioneers dressing up as their favorite character. The padding absorbs the shock and the armor absorbs the penetration of the blow.

Using cuendillar as armor would be as effective as steel against sword, axe and hammer blows and much more effective against arrow and crossbow bolts as the head wouldn't penetrate the armor.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1853 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1301 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 679 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1250 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1311 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 665 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1213 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1391 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1187 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 711 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1188 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1335 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 602 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1447 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1238 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1214 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1216 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1225 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1311 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1177 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1230 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 1120 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1291 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 1085 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 1096 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1221 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 1107 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 1074 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 737 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1187 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1181 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1140 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1242 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 1115 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 1085 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1223 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1206 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1147 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 1091 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1273 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 1091 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1274 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1416 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 1224 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 1084 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 1094 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1264 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 1117 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 1113 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1269 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 1137 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 1117 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1250 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 668 Views

Reply to Message