Active Users:872 Time:01/02/2026 12:57:24 PM
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM
Full plate armor consists of multiple armor plates connected together either with metal connectors or leather toggles. Converting each plate individually once shaped and then connecting them into a suit as normal shouldn't pose any problem at all.

As with any armor, you would still need the padding layers beneath the armor shell, something that has been forgotten by many conventioneers dressing up as their favorite character. The padding absorbs the shock and the armor absorbs the penetration of the blow.

Using cuendillar as armor would be as effective as steel against sword, axe and hammer blows and much more effective against arrow and crossbow bolts as the head wouldn't penetrate the armor.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1667 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1142 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 593 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1053 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1133 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 547 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1040 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1205 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1001 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 591 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1012 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1165 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 506 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1266 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1054 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1037 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1049 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1047 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1136 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 988 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1038 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 936 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1086 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 916 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 921 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1032 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 922 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 894 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 649 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1006 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 976 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 961 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1071 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 943 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 902 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1027 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1002 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 965 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 891 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1031 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 904 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1068 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1237 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 908 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 885 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1071 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 930 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 922 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1079 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 939 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 907 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1028 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 571 Views

Reply to Message