Active Users:389 Time:01/05/2025 12:18:25 PM
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM
Full plate armor consists of multiple armor plates connected together either with metal connectors or leather toggles. Converting each plate individually once shaped and then connecting them into a suit as normal shouldn't pose any problem at all.

As with any armor, you would still need the padding layers beneath the armor shell, something that has been forgotten by many conventioneers dressing up as their favorite character. The padding absorbs the shock and the armor absorbs the penetration of the blow.

Using cuendillar as armor would be as effective as steel against sword, axe and hammer blows and much more effective against arrow and crossbow bolts as the head wouldn't penetrate the armor.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1490 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 951 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 502 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 858 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 958 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 459 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 847 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1043 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 835 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 498 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 818 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 963 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 429 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1020 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 885 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 859 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 857 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 889 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 937 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 782 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 864 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 744 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 881 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 729 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 749 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 861 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 740 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 729 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 574 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 846 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 790 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 795 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 903 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 738 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 756 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 857 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 827 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 790 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 697 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 805 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 717 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 848 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1013 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 734 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 717 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 869 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 750 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 751 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 921 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 738 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 729 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 789 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 465 Views

Reply to Message