RJ never really went into the OP defying properties of C. The fireballs are pure weaves of fire, no weave, no fire, no heat. We also do not know about the heat transferance properties of C. For all we know it could pass heat like tin foil, or be so resistant to it you could hold it in your hand while someone plays a palsma torch over it. We just don't know. Lightning might or might not be effective. C started as iron, but is it still ferrous? If not, just how perfect an insulator is it? It could be such a high value insulator that lighting will not strike it, again we just don't know.
An interesting debate might be what would happen if someone wearing C armor got hit by balefire. Balefire is pure OP that burns you out of the pattern backwards, but C is immune to the OP. Would it just wash off you, or could (theoretically) a channeler use enough OP to burn far enough back to before you put it on, or before the armor was converted from iron...
My position is simple. C armor would not be hard to make, making it would not violate any of the oaths, and C armor is substantially better than normal armor. just how much better is something we can go round and round on because only RJ could have given a definitive answer; but he never did.
An interesting debate might be what would happen if someone wearing C armor got hit by balefire. Balefire is pure OP that burns you out of the pattern backwards, but C is immune to the OP. Would it just wash off you, or could (theoretically) a channeler use enough OP to burn far enough back to before you put it on, or before the armor was converted from iron...
My position is simple. C armor would not be hard to make, making it would not violate any of the oaths, and C armor is substantially better than normal armor. just how much better is something we can go round and round on because only RJ could have given a definitive answer; but he never did.
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
- 1492 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
- 953 Views
I suppose I am on a...
10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
- 860 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
- 1005 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
- 1044 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
- 1021 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
- 938 Views
Ummm, Warders...
14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
- 783 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
- 865 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
- 745 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
- 882 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
- 730 Views
which way is it?
15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
- 751 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
- 862 Views
That's really not my point.
15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
- 741 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
- 847 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
- 791 Views
Not nesecarrily
15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
- 797 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
- 905 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
- 740 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
- 758 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
- 779 Views

Not accurate
15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
- 858 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
- 829 Views
I disagree
15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
- 792 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
- 699 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
- 806 Views
nope
15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
- 718 Views
*Shrug*
15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
- 850 Views
Re: *Shrug*
15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
- 1015 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
- 782 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
- 723 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
- 736 Views
Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
- 719 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
- 871 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
- 751 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
- 922 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
- 739 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
- 730 Views