Active Users:406 Time:17/06/2025 01:08:22 AM
nope HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
Have you ever actually swung a sowrd at someone or had one swung at you? From your statements, I'd hazard a guess that the answer is "no"

Any SCA folks on the boards want to weigh in on the value of armor, cause folks just aint beleiving me when I say that knowing you are not going to get cut up like a meatloaf matters. Light-weight (less material needed) yet resiliant (C is unbreakable) IS the holy grail of armoring. Always has been, always will be and the improvement of C over steel/iron is anything but marginal.


Look elsewhere for my opinion of C weapons, in a nutshell, they have no benefit unless you have modern computer controlled manufacuting techniques (able to make micrometer fine edges), and even then the benifit is slight because you need some mass behind the weapon.

Not sure of your impracticls criteria. I have discussed manufacturing elsewhere, and it is very simple, even full plate becomes much easier because the much thinner sheets allows shaping around forms to bechilds play, especially since you do not have to worry about temper.

Summation: It is easier to make armor plates that are intended to be transformed, and the final product would be much more effective. In my book that makes it a "no-brainer"
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1506 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 971 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 508 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 896 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 995 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 467 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 869 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1059 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 851 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 505 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 838 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 988 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 436 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1095 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 901 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 875 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 873 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 906 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 956 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 796 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 888 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 759 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 897 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 744 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 768 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 876 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 756 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 744 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 583 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 863 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 806 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 812 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 924 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 757 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 770 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 874 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 841 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 808 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 714 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 818 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 738 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 866 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1029 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 752 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 737 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 892 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 768 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 771 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 941 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 776 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 756 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 809 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 474 Views

Reply to Message