Active Users:418 Time:17/09/2025 02:58:32 AM
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM
The plates deforing is what is called a "bad thing". The armor works by preventing the concentrated impact of the weapon from reaching the soft body underneath. This is accomplished by several means, none of which include denting the armor. The short (and incomplete) description is that it takes the impact from the weapon, and spreads the force across the surface area of the plate. If the plate deforms, the force is no longer spread. I can go into the physics of it, or you can just believe me.</quote

a) I'm enjoying this argument, but try not to be so condescending.

b) While a larger area to spread the pressure over means less force, a denting armor is similar to the "crumple zone" on cars, which is what I think Lorraine is getting at. The denting armor means that the contact lasts longer, so by deltap = Ft, there is less force imparted by the same swing.
At last, I have an apostrophe!

*MySmiley*
Foil fencers Dance the Spears. Or, at least, the foils.

Too stubborn to remove that extraneous *MySmiley*

~The Decapitator~
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1560 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1022 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 538 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 947 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1039 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 498 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 927 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1105 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 894 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 536 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 898 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1039 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 459 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1158 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 956 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 928 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 929 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 956 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1005 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 852 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 926 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 831 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 951 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 794 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 822 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 926 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 798 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 790 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 606 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 907 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 860 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 851 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 975 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 799 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 813 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 927 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 912 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 878 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 761 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 898 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 788 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 926 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1078 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 798 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 784 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 955 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 819 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 829 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 986 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 817 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 807 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 852 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 511 Views

Reply to Message