Active Users:866 Time:08/02/2026 11:57:50 AM
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and Onarishma Send a noteboard - 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM
not sure how it can be more clear than this statement:

"Personally I think those circles needed to be significantly Stronger than an individual Forsaken for the Rand's people to have survived."


ummm... a circle is made up of people the "strength" of the circle is the combined strength of the people in the circle. I was saying that the combined strength of the circle does not have to equal Demandreds strength in order to have a stronger EFFECT than Demandred. Are we on the same page yet.

If Demandreds strength is 95 its sounded like you were saying the circle memebers combined strength had to add up to more than 95 in order to be effective against him. Im saying that the combined strength could be less than 95. They could have been at 65-70 but the effect of the circle would still be able to match or overwhelm a 95.


I specifically noted the circle's strength ... We have no way of knowing how much advantage a circle gives, the individuals could added up to 60 or 150 for all we really know. We can't even accurately guess at anyone in the circle's individual strength. All we know for fact is that Demandred believes the first few weaves Flinn hit him with were as powerful as what Demandred could generate. Those weaves could have been 100% as powerful as Flinns circle could create or 50% as powerful or anywhere else. we have no way of knowing and we know the Forsaken have a tendency to lie to themselves which means those weaves could have been stronger than Demandreds weaves.


the actual strength. potency versus quantity. If you meant potency thats all well and good but there are enough people here who don't believe in potency being different from quantity and so as I said you were not clear. Making thing bold would mean nothing to someone who believed that potency and quantity were equivalent in a circle.
Reply to message
I really hate to bring up strength in the OP, but thankfully it doesn't regard Egwene or any women. - 04/12/2012 06:01:45 AM 1883 Views
My thoughts - 04/12/2012 07:15:44 AM 1296 Views
90 is REALLY high - 04/12/2012 07:25:15 AM 1261 Views
Couple of things ... **reminder that this is a lot of speculation** - 04/12/2012 04:29:50 PM 1250 Views
Narishma is definitely stronger, you're right. - 07/12/2012 03:00:53 AM 1146 Views
He was stronger than Aginor in order to channel the power of the Eye - 07/12/2012 03:00:10 PM 1164 Views
No I don't think so - 07/12/2012 04:13:48 PM 1035 Views
I'd say more than 80 - 07/12/2012 07:07:32 PM 990 Views
81 then - 07/12/2012 08:11:34 PM 902 Views
and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 09:13:42 PM 978 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 10:14:53 PM 1006 Views
there were more like MILLIONS of Forsaken during these times - 07/12/2012 10:30:34 PM 995 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 28/12/2012 08:44:51 PM 821 Views
Aginors defeat could be a result of multiple factors. So can Ishmaels - 07/12/2012 01:24:18 PM 1043 Views
Regardless, Rand was clearly in the same strength category when Aginor and he faced off - 07/12/2012 03:03:04 PM 1045 Views
I disagree. - 07/12/2012 06:55:43 PM 940 Views
Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:12:44 PM 990 Views
Re: Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:51:37 PM 944 Views
he faced Asmodean strength for strength before Rahvin - 07/12/2012 09:23:42 PM 1039 Views
Just to be a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:17:11 PM 872 Views
you don't actually have to tell us all you are a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:36:25 PM 1031 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2012 06:22:49 AM 866 Views
think youre misjudgjng the benefits of the link. they dont have to add up to 90. - 07/12/2012 12:34:59 PM 982 Views
There is also no why to tell if Flinn hit Demandred with all the strength available to him either - 07/12/2012 03:05:38 PM 965 Views
the "circle" was stronger but the individuals weren't *NM* - 07/12/2012 06:58:38 PM 586 Views
that's what I just said *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:23:34 PM 519 Views
that was not clear *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:43:54 PM 605 Views
*shrug* - 07/12/2012 09:25:00 PM 870 Views
Re: *shrug* - 10/12/2012 11:27:42 PM 963 Views
If I had said the individuals in the circle added to Dmandreds strength perhaps - 11/12/2012 03:28:23 AM 1007 Views
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and - 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM 920 Views
whatever ... didn't think it was necessary ... and with that I'm done - 11/12/2012 09:16:03 PM 886 Views
- 17/12/2012 11:22:55 PM 1187 Views
About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 08/12/2012 12:37:38 AM 1119 Views
Perhaps - 08/12/2012 01:01:21 AM 937 Views
Re: Perhaps - 08/12/2012 02:06:39 AM 997 Views
Like I said ... Could be - 08/12/2012 02:33:43 AM 974 Views
I disagree... - 08/12/2012 04:53:09 AM 934 Views
Re: I disagree... - 08/12/2012 05:20:08 AM 859 Views
I disagree again! - 08/12/2012 05:49:15 AM 939 Views
Probably - 08/12/2012 02:46:15 PM 973 Views
Re: Probably - 09/12/2012 07:51:59 PM 986 Views
Not really - 09/12/2012 10:13:07 PM 907 Views
Re: Not really - 10/12/2012 01:05:54 AM 923 Views
Re: Not really - 13/12/2012 03:58:48 PM 1007 Views
I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 08/12/2012 06:18:45 AM 989 Views
We're essentially saying the same thing now - 08/12/2012 02:37:17 PM 936 Views
Re: I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 28/12/2012 08:08:21 PM 850 Views
Always thought the forsaken didn't really know much about Rand - 08/12/2012 02:38:08 AM 1003 Views
And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 02:43:15 AM 926 Views
Re: And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 05:34:54 AM 990 Views
Who can say. Graendal wraps them so deep in compulsion that she can dig - 08/12/2012 05:42:39 AM 978 Views
Oops, double post. *NM* - 08/12/2012 09:34:36 AM 590 Views
Re: About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 11/12/2012 11:36:51 PM 970 Views
Re: Rand v Aginor - 16/12/2012 01:46:08 PM 923 Views
Not a bad theory and I've read it before - 16/12/2012 07:42:31 PM 869 Views

Reply to Message