Active Users:422 Time:17/09/2025 08:28:30 AM
Re: Rand v Aginor Watcher Send a noteboard - 16/12/2012 01:46:08 PM
One other thing to remember when judging how strong Rand was at the Eye, we don't know that Aginor was 100% either. We know from Rand's & Asmodean's comments that the physical condition of the body affects how much you can channel. When Rand broke free from the AS he noted that he was in bad shape and worried about how strong he was channeling. Again Asmodean told Rand after his long range duel with Sammael in Cairhien that its dangerous to channell if the body is exhausted.

What has all this to do with the events at the Eye. By all accounts Aginor had just been released and he was not looking so good. We know from quotes in the series and RJ's Q&A that the two forsaken were sealed very close to the surface so they were aware of what was going on in the world but they were aged as well.

When Aginor went to the Eye he was probably not at full strenght himself. This did not worry him as his companion was in just as bad a shape as he was perhaps worse and he was going to face someone completly untrained. Rand was strong at the time, he was able to skim and his attack on the shadowspawn was impressive but he may not have been full forsaken strenght then and still be able to match Aginor who burned himself out because he drew what he was capable of holding on an ordinary day and never took into acount that his body had been worn down by 3,000 years.
Reply to message
I really hate to bring up strength in the OP, but thankfully it doesn't regard Egwene or any women. - 04/12/2012 06:01:45 AM 1805 Views
My thoughts - 04/12/2012 07:15:44 AM 1228 Views
90 is REALLY high - 04/12/2012 07:25:15 AM 1176 Views
Couple of things ... **reminder that this is a lot of speculation** - 04/12/2012 04:29:50 PM 1156 Views
Narishma is definitely stronger, you're right. - 07/12/2012 03:00:53 AM 1072 Views
He was stronger than Aginor in order to channel the power of the Eye - 07/12/2012 03:00:10 PM 1064 Views
No I don't think so - 07/12/2012 04:13:48 PM 946 Views
I'd say more than 80 - 07/12/2012 07:07:32 PM 906 Views
81 then - 07/12/2012 08:11:34 PM 850 Views
and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 09:13:42 PM 912 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 10:14:53 PM 932 Views
there were more like MILLIONS of Forsaken during these times - 07/12/2012 10:30:34 PM 914 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 28/12/2012 08:44:51 PM 726 Views
Aginors defeat could be a result of multiple factors. So can Ishmaels - 07/12/2012 01:24:18 PM 968 Views
Regardless, Rand was clearly in the same strength category when Aginor and he faced off - 07/12/2012 03:03:04 PM 956 Views
I disagree. - 07/12/2012 06:55:43 PM 844 Views
Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:12:44 PM 901 Views
Re: Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:51:37 PM 862 Views
he faced Asmodean strength for strength before Rahvin - 07/12/2012 09:23:42 PM 957 Views
Just to be a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:17:11 PM 820 Views
you don't actually have to tell us all you are a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:36:25 PM 964 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2012 06:22:49 AM 788 Views
think youre misjudgjng the benefits of the link. they dont have to add up to 90. - 07/12/2012 12:34:59 PM 903 Views
There is also no why to tell if Flinn hit Demandred with all the strength available to him either - 07/12/2012 03:05:38 PM 899 Views
the "circle" was stronger but the individuals weren't *NM* - 07/12/2012 06:58:38 PM 557 Views
that's what I just said *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:23:34 PM 488 Views
that was not clear *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:43:54 PM 578 Views
*shrug* - 07/12/2012 09:25:00 PM 804 Views
Re: *shrug* - 10/12/2012 11:27:42 PM 914 Views
If I had said the individuals in the circle added to Dmandreds strength perhaps - 11/12/2012 03:28:23 AM 942 Views
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and - 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM 840 Views
whatever ... didn't think it was necessary ... and with that I'm done - 11/12/2012 09:16:03 PM 825 Views
- 17/12/2012 11:22:55 PM 1126 Views
About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 08/12/2012 12:37:38 AM 1046 Views
Perhaps - 08/12/2012 01:01:21 AM 876 Views
Re: Perhaps - 08/12/2012 02:06:39 AM 935 Views
Like I said ... Could be - 08/12/2012 02:33:43 AM 921 Views
I disagree... - 08/12/2012 04:53:09 AM 860 Views
Re: I disagree... - 08/12/2012 05:20:08 AM 789 Views
I disagree again! - 08/12/2012 05:49:15 AM 881 Views
Probably - 08/12/2012 02:46:15 PM 907 Views
Re: Probably - 09/12/2012 07:51:59 PM 904 Views
Not really - 09/12/2012 10:13:07 PM 827 Views
Re: Not really - 10/12/2012 01:05:54 AM 841 Views
Re: Not really - 13/12/2012 03:58:48 PM 927 Views
I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 08/12/2012 06:18:45 AM 903 Views
We're essentially saying the same thing now - 08/12/2012 02:37:17 PM 851 Views
Re: I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 28/12/2012 08:08:21 PM 791 Views
Always thought the forsaken didn't really know much about Rand - 08/12/2012 02:38:08 AM 928 Views
And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 02:43:15 AM 860 Views
Re: And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 05:34:54 AM 928 Views
Who can say. Graendal wraps them so deep in compulsion that she can dig - 08/12/2012 05:42:39 AM 900 Views
Oops, double post. *NM* - 08/12/2012 09:34:36 AM 564 Views
Re: About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 11/12/2012 11:36:51 PM 908 Views
Re: Rand v Aginor - 16/12/2012 01:46:08 PM 855 Views
Not a bad theory and I've read it before - 16/12/2012 07:42:31 PM 813 Views

Reply to Message