In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.
Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.
CK was created at the end of the war, after the whole balefire thing. This means that when those cities were balefired, LESS power was used than CK at maximum.
It seems to me then, that if the power was directly connected to the width of the destruction area, to destroy a city of 100K people would have required a truly humongous amount of power. More than the AoLers had available.
I mean when Rand, the most powerfull channeler, using an angreal creates the most powerfull balefirestream he can, its about the thickness of a man. A meter or so maybe? How big is a city of 100K. Many kilometers certainly. If the only way to increase the thickness of the bar is extra strength. and the most powerfull channeler, with an angreal could only create a bar meter thick, imagine the sheer immense power required to do one several kilometers thick to wipe out a city in a single blow.
So it seems likely to me that there is a way to create a balefire bar that destroyes things in a large area, but only burns things back a short time. Essentially, this strongly implies that a skilled channeler can alter the form of the balefire. It can be a spear directed at a single target with most of the strength in it going to burn the target backwards as much as possible. Or it can be a sort of weapon of mass destruction, where the strength is added to the area effected, while lessening the time the threads burn backwards.
Given that, the most likely explanation to me was that Rand, using LTT knowledge did just that. He used the CK to create a beam wide enough to erase the whole of the palace at a single blow, but still kept the total strength level low to miminize the damage to the pattern.
I should also say that if the pattern could survive the instant annihilation of hundred thousand people at a single instant, how bad could the deaths of 300 people truly be? Adds more credence to the idea that Rand, with LTT's memories knows far better how much the pattern can take than Cadsuane or any other AS.
Seems clear to me, though I do admit that I am pretty tired and going to bed now. Hopefully this will still make sense to me in the morning.

Goodnight all!
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1615 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 1017 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 852 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 970 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 888 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 856 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 805 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 928 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 836 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 900 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 786 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 879 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 812 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 850 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1282 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 922 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 866 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 425 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 827 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 458 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 774 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 893 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 812 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 851 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 845 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 832 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 829 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 846 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 805 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 787 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 759 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 862 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 749 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 818 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 827 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 840 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 784 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 853 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 784 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 728 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 907 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 841 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 822 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 917 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 759 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 768 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 843 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 790 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 821 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 767 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 772 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 834 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 776 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 920 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 876 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 827 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 861 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 755 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 864 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 846 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 771 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 850 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 853 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 765 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1076 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 802 Views