Active Users:1239 Time:03/05/2026 06:09:17 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
The way it reads sounds like it could take a lot of time after someone's death to secure the right body... so unless it's a journey that takes months after your death I'm thinking Balefire shouldn't really make all that much difference.


Umm no, DO keeps your soul in his grasp, maybe inside the bore while waiting for a body to be secured. But the initial capture of the soul has to happen quickly. However, once the DO has your soul in his grasp, he can keep it from escaping to join the pattern.

So to continue my example. If he captured you in those 2 minutes, he could then keep your soul in his hand for years if he wanted to, he would not need to find a body in the remaining 3 minutes. But if he missed that 5 minute window, nothing could be done.


does not compute
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? Datakim - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1834 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1243 Views
On Balefire Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1229 Views
Good point Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1259 Views
On the nature of BaleFire Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1161 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. Datakim - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 1072 Views
Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1148 Views
Re: Wait! callandor1000 - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 1062 Views
Re: Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 1052 Views
Re: Wait! callandor1000 - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 1025 Views
Re: Wait! Datakim - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 1025 Views
I disagree Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 977 Views
Re: I disagree Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 1022 Views
Re: I disagree Lord Haart - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 1003 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1119 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 1021 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1122 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 1041 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1097 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 1029 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1096 Views
I agree with Templar Lord Haart - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 994 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM 1532 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1121 Views
Rand crossed a line Etzel - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1123 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line Datakim - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 1082 Views
But... Etzel - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1158 Views
Re: But... Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 965 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1113 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* Etzel - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 541 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 1022 Views
What? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 1034 Views
Where did you get that? Gher - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 995 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 546 Views
LOL ... super-death! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 962 Views
Hah! *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 540 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 996 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 953 Views
Yes it was. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1102 Views
Re: Yes it was. Datakim - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 1067 Views
Re: Yes it was. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 1056 Views
Re: Yes it was. Datakim - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 1054 Views
let me ask the question in a different way darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 1059 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 1038 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1121 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 990 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM 994 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead? Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM 953 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1095 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 939 Views
you are kidding right? darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 1040 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 1015 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 1040 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 1045 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 967 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 1057 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 1022 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 939 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1093 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 1063 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 1068 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: Sidious - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 997 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: RugbyPlayingAshaman - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 1027 Views
What might work... Etzel - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 935 Views
Re: What might work... Datakim - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 956 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again Itachi - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1132 Views
Meh Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 958 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 964 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! Datakim - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 1064 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 1024 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 1021 Views
*laughs behind hand* darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1096 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 942 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 990 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 1059 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 976 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1131 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1093 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. Datakim - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 1029 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 1053 Views
I concede Datakim - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 964 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. Cannoli - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1090 Views
Tee hee. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 1031 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, Nyrende - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 1038 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 975 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Cannoli - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 1043 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Lord Haart - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1231 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention Cannoli - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1356 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 937 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. Cannoli - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 970 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants darius_sedai - 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM 1104 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do. Cannoli - 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM 981 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules darius_sedai - 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM 1264 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ... amirebram - 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM 1019 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes