Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
When in fact they are closer to Prisoners of War. So what Rand did was nuke a POW camp because a high ranking General for the enemy was there. How well do you think a legitimate Military Organization would treat a General who did that?
I am not. I am judging the morality. I know they are not combatants. They are civilians, NOT prisoners of war. One might be construed as having some moral obligations to POWs. Your analogy would be more correct if you said concentration camp, rather than POW camp, and that would STILL be a valid target in the situation you describe any way. Just because some government bureaucracy obsessed with image and media double-standards might disapprove of something does not make it immoral. I guess you agree that homosexuality is grounds for dismissal & exclusion then, as the most prominent legitimate Military Organization in the world feels?
they are essentially POWs. Concentration camp is another apt analogy. Your opinion doesn't make something moral to anyone but you. Morality is too subjective/personal to really define... the truly telling part is that Rand found the act immoral, as he later insinuates when he thinks about what he's done.
As for homosexuality in the military, there are military organizations that allow it ... Israel for one,not sure what that has to do with this conversation though.
I'm talking about human rights organizations and the wider military mentality... i.e. a General who did what Rand did would likely be brought up on war crimes charges!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1859 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1272 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1106 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1181 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1091 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1081 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1049 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1055 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1149 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1051 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1158 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1080 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1129 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1059 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1124 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1563 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1155 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1155 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
557 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1055 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
565 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
997 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1139 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1110 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1085 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1080 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1090 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1066 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1158 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1024 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1024 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
987 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1140 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
976 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1048 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1065 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1075 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1002 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1084 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1058 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
971 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1121 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1100 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1107 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1165 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
993 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
991 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1090 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1053 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1050 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
983 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1021 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1089 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1007 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1175 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1120 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1120 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1058 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1081 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
999 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1115 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1066 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1002 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1083 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1136 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1006 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1291 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1048 Views
