Wait!
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1860 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1272 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1106 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1181 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1092 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1081 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1049 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1056 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1150 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1051 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1158 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1080 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1129 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1059 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1124 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1563 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1156 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1155 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
558 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1056 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
565 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
997 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1140 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1110 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1085 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1080 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1090 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1066 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1158 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1024 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1024 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
987 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1140 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
976 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1048 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1065 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1075 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1003 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1084 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1058 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
971 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1121 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1100 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1107 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1165 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
993 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
991 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1090 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1053 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1050 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
983 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1021 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1089 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1007 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1175 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1120 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1120 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1058 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1082 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
999 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1115 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1066 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1002 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1083 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1137 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1007 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1291 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1048 Views
