BF does not go on infinitely - it's range is relative to it's power.
Also, it's not how many people die that matters (at least, from a Pattern POV, not from an ethical POV) in terms of damage to the Pattern. Brandon stated that all items/objects also have threads.
Think of it this way - using BF is like pouring hot, molten lava into a big bowl. If you pour small droplets in, then the bowl will cool down before each droplet, but if you pour lots on at once, it will start to melt.
So it's not about how the BF is used so much as it's about how much BF is used.
At least, that's my understanding.
Also, it's not how many people die that matters (at least, from a Pattern POV, not from an ethical POV) in terms of damage to the Pattern. Brandon stated that all items/objects also have threads.
Think of it this way - using BF is like pouring hot, molten lava into a big bowl. If you pour small droplets in, then the bowl will cool down before each droplet, but if you pour lots on at once, it will start to melt.
So it's not about how the BF is used so much as it's about how much BF is used.
At least, that's my understanding.
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1859 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1272 Views
On Balefire
- 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM
1262 Views
Good point
- 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM
1292 Views
On the nature of BaleFire
- 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM
1198 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1106 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1181 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1091 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1081 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1049 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1055 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1149 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1050 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1158 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1080 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1129 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1059 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1124 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1563 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1155 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1155 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
557 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1055 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
565 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
997 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1139 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1110 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1085 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1080 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1090 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1066 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1158 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1024 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1024 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
987 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1140 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
976 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1048 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1065 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1075 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1002 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1084 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1058 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
971 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1121 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1100 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1107 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1165 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
993 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
991 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1090 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1053 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1050 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
983 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1021 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1089 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1007 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1175 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions 
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1119 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1119 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1058 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1081 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
999 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1115 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1066 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1002 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1083 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1136 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1006 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1290 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1047 Views