Active Users:503 Time:17/06/2026 07:57:50 AM
Re: Wait! Datakim Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM

Not irrelevant at all. If I recall, some things aren't just all about out and out brute strength with the OP. It takes the two halves of the OP working together to accomplish the greatest feats. That's why there were two CK and an access key for each. And the CK weren't simply made for creating balefire, but for resealing the DO's prison, only that effort fell apart when the CK were lost into Shadow territory during the war.


Yes. But the point is that the CK were being built, because not even mixed links of 72, composed of both men and women, would have been sufficient to do what had to be done. That suggests to me atleast that the CK are far more powerfull than the maximum circles available to the AoLers.

The point I am making is that the before they understood the danger, the AoLers were able to take out cities with 100K people in, and I quote "one go". To me that suggests an instant annihilation.

We know that Rand, the most powerfull channeler, using an angreal in rage, using all his strength, created a bar as thick as 1 meter.

The city/town I live in is relatively small. Only 70K people. And yet it is 37 km width. Now thats not exact since cities are not perfect squares but go with me. Lets take 7 km away just for that and we get 30km.

If there is no way to modify the width of the balefire, how the heck would a circle of 72, which is the absolute maximum, create a bar of 30km width! The power required would be utterly silly. Not to mention that if strength and width were connected, the balefire stream there would have had to burn all those 100K people back days or even weeks. Which would probably have instantly destroyed the pattern.

I think there is a way to choose how balefire works, and that when that city was wiped out, the balefire was made in such a way that it was incredibly large, but incredibly weak. So each citizen of that city was burned back by lets say half a second only. And the strength all went into the area of effect.

Now that would still be devastating ofcourse. Even though the people were barely burned, it was still a hundred thousand people taken out of the pattern in a single go as RJ said. Nasty stuff.

The bottom line is, I think it is perfectly reasonable of me to think that when Rand balefired Graendals palace, he did this. He used a small amount of what CK could offer to extend the balefire streams width, so that he would take out the entire palace in "one go". But he kept the total strength as low as possible to minimise the damage since he did not want to unmake existence just yet. In doing so he got Graendal (probably) but did not cause immense damage. Some yes, but not anywhere close enough to bring the pattern anywhere near to total destruction which is what Min and Nynaeve seemed to think.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1860 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1272 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1262 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1292 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1198 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 1106 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1181 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 1091 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 1081 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 1049 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 1056 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 1014 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 1050 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 1034 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1150 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 1051 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1158 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 1080 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1129 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 1059 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1124 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 1038 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1149 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1156 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 1104 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1189 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 1000 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1155 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 558 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 1056 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 1061 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 1023 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 565 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 997 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 558 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 1035 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 980 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1140 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 1110 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 1085 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 1080 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 1090 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 1066 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1158 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 1024 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1140 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 976 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 1070 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 1048 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 1065 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 1075 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 1002 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 1084 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 1058 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 971 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1121 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 1100 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 1107 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 1028 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 1061 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 965 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 988 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1165 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 993 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 991 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 1090 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 1053 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 1050 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 1123 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 983 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 1021 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 1089 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 1007 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1175 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1120 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 1058 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 1082 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 999 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1115 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 1075 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 1066 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 1002 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 1083 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1262 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1387 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 966 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 1001 Views

Reply to Message