Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
I don't think it takes that much to exercise imagination in this regard. Rand's defeated Rahvin by confronting him directly, and Rahvin's modus operandi and intelligence mirror Graendals pretty well.
Anyway, frankly speaking, I don't think that your failure to imagine any other possibility aside from massive use of balefire as a solution to this problem would prevent you from explaining why the thousands of ways Rand could have done this differently would not have worked.
My response is that Rand was a psycho and verging on becoming the Dark One's pawn in TGS and that scene especially.
Honestly, sometimes I think there are fans that would have preferred Rand balefired Nynaeve, destroyed the Borderland armies and perhaps Far Madding and then balefired the Seanchan with the amount of glee some of the more disturbing scenes in TGS produced.
Anyway, frankly speaking, I don't think that your failure to imagine any other possibility aside from massive use of balefire as a solution to this problem would prevent you from explaining why the thousands of ways Rand could have done this differently would not have worked.
My response is that Rand was a psycho and verging on becoming the Dark One's pawn in TGS and that scene especially.
Honestly, sometimes I think there are fans that would have preferred Rand balefired Nynaeve, destroyed the Borderland armies and perhaps Far Madding and then balefired the Seanchan with the amount of glee some of the more disturbing scenes in TGS produced.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1938 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1404 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1194 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1281 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1183 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1169 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1139 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1141 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1231 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1156 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1243 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1195 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1211 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1140 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1215 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1656 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1240 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1267 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
605 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1144 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
608 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
1083 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1226 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1196 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1176 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1170 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1184 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1153 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1283 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1109 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1100 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
1067 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1259 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
1105 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1128 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1142 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1160 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1097 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1176 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1137 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
1058 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1207 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1191 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1200 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1248 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
1098 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
1075 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1178 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1146 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1135 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
1059 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1105 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1196 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1089 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1254 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1205 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1205 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1132 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1192 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
1090 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1209 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1155 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1109 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1159 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1208 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1082 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1379 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1129 Views
