Active Users:1104 Time:15/09/2025 09:27:02 PM
I concede Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
Well. I was reading the book trying to come up with another argument for Fanatic-Templar, and I just realised something. I think I totally messed everything up here.

My original idea was based on two fronts.

1. Rand was right that the people that Graendal had compulsed were so braindead that for all intents and purposes they were not alive at all and the only one truly alive there was Graendal. The rest were zombies. I think that this still has merit.

2. LTT/Rand was still sane enough at the point the balefiring happened that he would have been carefull to use a minimum amount of force. If there was a chance to destroy the pattern, he would not have done it. And also that having LTT memories would mean that he would know exactly how much damage the pattern could take, better than anyone. So essentially no balefire atrocity.

However, upon re-reading the book, I just realised that the balefire incident happened a lot later in the books than I thought it did. I thought it happened relatively early, before Rand started agreeing with LTT that death was preferable. It did not. It happened very near the end.

This causes the floor to drop entirely from my argument. There is no reason to assume that the totally suicidal Rand that he already is at this point would be especially carefull with Balefire. He is more Moridin than TwoRivers!Rand already.

So I admit, I was probably wrong about the whole balefire thing and that those who argued with me about that are right and that it was indeed a crazy atrocity.

Damnit.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1661 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1064 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1064 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1109 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 999 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 895 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1020 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 926 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 898 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 848 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 856 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 804 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 836 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 817 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 972 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 878 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 947 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 855 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 923 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 857 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 915 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 839 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 958 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 962 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 881 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 992 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 802 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 942 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 454 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 872 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 883 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 836 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 481 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 819 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 471 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 832 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 806 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 932 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 852 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 895 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 888 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 894 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 885 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 911 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 839 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 936 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 786 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 895 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 861 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 870 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 886 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 830 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 898 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 846 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 783 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 953 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 889 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 874 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 842 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 877 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 783 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 808 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 967 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 805 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 814 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 894 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 854 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 861 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 939 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 802 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 812 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 878 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 826 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 966 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 917 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 865 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 905 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 805 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 912 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 876 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 894 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 814 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 894 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1053 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1187 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 785 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message