Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
I don't think so. He could have done any number of things. You are just refusing to see the alternatives because you want to take the easy way out, as he did.
This might have been a job for a channeler with subterfuge and good intelligence like Cadsuane and her cadre to manage rather than Rand.
But, as I said in my initial post, I think indulging in mass murder is not something I'll ever reward with fan-support regardless of who does and regardless of who is killed. If you win by sacrificing everything you believe in, it becomes a pyrrhic victory, and I think this had the potential to become that.
This might have been a job for a channeler with subterfuge and good intelligence like Cadsuane and her cadre to manage rather than Rand.
But, as I said in my initial post, I think indulging in mass murder is not something I'll ever reward with fan-support regardless of who does and regardless of who is killed. If you win by sacrificing everything you believe in, it becomes a pyrrhic victory, and I think this had the potential to become that.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1594 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 993 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 831 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 951 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 864 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 833 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 785 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 908 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 815 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 878 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 758 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 853 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 791 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 804 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1264 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 900 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 799 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 411 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 807 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 448 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 754 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 869 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 792 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 829 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 821 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 808 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 808 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 827 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 782 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 763 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 738 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 837 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 724 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 797 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 806 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 819 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 761 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 833 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 765 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 708 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 885 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 819 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 796 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 893 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 741 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 745 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 823 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 768 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 801 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 744 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 749 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 813 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 753 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 897 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 852 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 807 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 840 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 734 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 842 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 830 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 751 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 824 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 828 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 743 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1054 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 781 Views