Active Users:482 Time:28/03/2026 09:44:16 AM
Heh. Oh, Ryan. Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM
Besides, by what "rules" would Adam be banned? This is an open forum: we don't have rules. Go check the top. If we had rules, they would clearly outline what is appropriate, and what is inappropriate. We have certainly adopted standards of practice from Wotmania, but we can't go around banning people because we don't like what they say, at least without a basis for what we are doing, especially if there is nothing that prohibits the action. I continually see people critizing Adam for what he says. I don't have a problem with it; it's his opinion, and he is often mildly amusing. But going and complaining at people in what you perceive as "rude" while being "rude" yourself is only degrading the conversation to the point of asininity.


Were he speaking his opinion on the topic, even in a rude fashion, that would be something. However, this was just an unprovoked insult against a person who was trying to do a favor to the community, though perhaps going about it in the wrong way. But Adam is often not merely rude, but making personal attacks. The rules of the forums should be the same as the rules of public civility, which Adam neglects to follow. That is why people look for him to be banned.
At last, I have an apostrophe!

*MySmiley*
Foil fencers Dance the Spears. Or, at least, the foils.

Too stubborn to remove that extraneous *MySmiley*

~The Decapitator~
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2656 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1391 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1238 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1286 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1352 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1188 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 743 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1136 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 673 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 724 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 689 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1223 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2248 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1199 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 685 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1305 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 680 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1221 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 1112 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1199 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 592 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 814 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 808 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 704 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 643 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 750 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 596 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 921 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 818 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 762 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 778 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 821 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 728 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 857 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 676 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 725 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 736 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 746 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 779 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 734 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 779 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 712 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 845 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 747 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 756 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 658 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 638 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 673 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 690 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 707 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 851 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 759 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 747 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 707 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1379 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1255 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1227 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1243 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 1102 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 1160 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1248 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1192 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1243 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1186 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1182 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1279 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1148 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1218 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1318 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1276 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1315 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1481 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1353 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1248 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1464 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1259 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1179 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1269 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1272 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1198 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1267 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1152 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1197 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1234 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1249 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1175 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1229 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1386 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 625 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1192 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 1158 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1396 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1209 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 1027 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1150 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1384 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 1148 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1337 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 1137 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1246 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1331 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 679 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1364 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1121 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1269 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1225 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1307 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1165 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 749 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1283 Views