Active Users:1195 Time:27/09/2026 12:41:13 PM
Are you trying to suggest that "Reformed" or some other brand of scientology is plausible? Joel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2011 04:28:40 PM
it always helps if they've a respectable age and have been believed in a good long while, so people have gotten used to them a bit. That said, even though the LDS church is, what, over a century and a half old, I have a hard time taking Mormon literalism more seriously than, well, Scientology literalism.

Scientology is like the Church of the Sub-Genius: Someone decided to start a joke religion with the explicit purpose of making money; the difference is that scientology somehow managed to be taken seriously. Guess Hubbard won his bet with Asimov/Le Guin/Campbell/any of the other individuals MANY people have stated Hubbard bet he could start a fake religion and get people to believe in it. Depending on ones perspective, that is evidence that either spirituality or credulity (possibly both) are integral to humanity.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2764 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1489 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 1335 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 1387 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1462 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 1298 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 798 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 1235 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 727 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 769 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 764 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 1327 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 2339 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 1287 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 738 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 1413 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 742 Views
In fairness, I wonder the same about Christian literalists. *NM* - 03/10/2011 07:57:19 PM 802 Views
Yeah, but if you're gonna believe absurdities... - 03/10/2011 09:02:32 PM 1389 Views
Are you trying to suggest that "Reformed" or some other brand of scientology is plausible? - 04/10/2011 04:28:40 PM 1344 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 1318 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 1226 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 1296 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 653 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 870 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 868 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 783 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 701 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 820 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 648 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 975 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 871 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 813 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 834 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 871 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 784 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 921 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 733 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 779 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 813 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 800 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 829 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 791 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 834 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 769 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 905 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 811 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 816 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 714 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 698 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 734 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 772 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 770 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 930 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 821 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 808 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 772 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1485 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 1354 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 1333 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 1347 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 1201 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 1272 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 1362 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 1290 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 1346 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 1274 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 1278 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 1360 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 1247 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 1310 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 1416 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 1380 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 1430 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1586 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 1461 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 1347 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1587 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 1377 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 1273 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 1366 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 1380 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 1285 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 1387 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 1263 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 1297 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 1336 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 1355 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 1351 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 1330 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1529 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 680 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 1273 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 1267 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1508 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 1311 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 1132 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 1251 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1487 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 1252 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 1447 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 1232 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 1359 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1443 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 737 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1464 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 1224 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 1372 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 1336 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 1402 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 1267 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 805 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 1385 Views

Reply to Message