Active Users:216 Time:24/04/2024 10:58:32 PM
Heh. Oh, Ryan. Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM
Besides, by what "rules" would Adam be banned? This is an open forum: we don't have rules. Go check the top. If we had rules, they would clearly outline what is appropriate, and what is inappropriate. We have certainly adopted standards of practice from Wotmania, but we can't go around banning people because we don't like what they say, at least without a basis for what we are doing, especially if there is nothing that prohibits the action. I continually see people critizing Adam for what he says. I don't have a problem with it; it's his opinion, and he is often mildly amusing. But going and complaining at people in what you perceive as "rude" while being "rude" yourself is only degrading the conversation to the point of asininity.


Were he speaking his opinion on the topic, even in a rude fashion, that would be something. However, this was just an unprovoked insult against a person who was trying to do a favor to the community, though perhaps going about it in the wrong way. But Adam is often not merely rude, but making personal attacks. The rules of the forums should be the same as the rules of public civility, which Adam neglects to follow. That is why people look for him to be banned.
At last, I have an apostrophe!

*MySmiley*
Foil fencers Dance the Spears. Or, at least, the foils.

Too stubborn to remove that extraneous *MySmiley*

~The Decapitator~
Reply to message
Mormons - 03/10/2011 05:46:10 AM 2290 Views
Questions. - 03/10/2011 11:13:25 AM 1050 Views
Ooh! Ooh! - 03/10/2011 11:18:38 AM 905 Views
I don't watch it. - 04/10/2011 01:34:53 AM 904 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:28:28 PM 1010 Views
Re: Questions. - 03/10/2011 01:31:13 PM 828 Views
Why did I look up what Quorn is? I didn't need to know that. *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:04:20 PM 592 Views
Wyld Stallyns!! - 03/10/2011 03:26:54 PM 843 Views
STATION! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:00:35 PM 520 Views
Re: One of the best replies, ever, on the internet. *NM* - 06/10/2011 02:43:07 AM 566 Views
....did we just get door-to-door'd...ONLINE?!?! *NM* - 03/10/2011 11:34:19 AM 547 Views
Nope. - 04/10/2011 01:32:43 AM 884 Views
there's no real point to it - 04/10/2011 02:37:24 AM 1894 Views
We could use an evil cackling smilie, we do have some other evil ones - 04/10/2011 02:49:12 AM 859 Views
wasn't going to argue... *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:57:00 AM 514 Views
Do you ever giggle at the name "Moroni?" - 03/10/2011 11:39:55 AM 949 Views
There are Mormon literalists? Seriously? *NM* - 03/10/2011 03:02:18 PM 529 Views
I know they don't have multiple wives anymore, so no misconception there - 03/10/2011 01:23:50 PM 886 Views
There are Fundamentalist "Mormons" who do... - 03/10/2011 11:32:56 PM 811 Views
Don't get me wrong by the way, I've met wonderful Mormons - 04/10/2011 12:22:03 PM 863 Views
Question: Why are you such a faggot? *NM* - 03/10/2011 02:23:45 PM 437 Views
Answer: because it's the only way he could return your burning love for him. - 03/10/2011 03:24:23 PM 664 Views
Oh dont be such a fuddy duddy. - 03/10/2011 10:42:06 PM 557 Views
Better a faggot than a fuckwad. Cheers fuckwad! *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:27:20 AM 556 Views
Well, I suppose you'ld be the one to know. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:54:35 AM 496 Views
Really? You really just pulled a "takes one to know one"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 04:19:22 PM 589 Views
Re: You embarrass yourself. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:56:02 AM 444 Views
I'll tell you whats embarresing... - 04/10/2011 02:08:02 AM 770 Views
That is hilarious. - 04/10/2011 03:10:50 AM 658 Views
Goodness.. - 04/10/2011 03:20:30 AM 604 Views
Re: - 04/10/2011 03:28:25 AM 634 Views
You know, my mother had a saying. - 04/10/2011 03:39:32 AM 666 Views
I think it's safe to say ... - 04/10/2011 04:09:17 AM 565 Views
I'm not sure which would be sadder... - 04/10/2011 11:32:55 AM 703 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 12:19:01 PM 530 Views
Re: You flatter me. *NM* - 04/10/2011 01:31:01 PM 551 Views
OK, you need to delete the "Re:" You're using it incorrectly - 04/10/2011 01:55:53 PM 580 Views
"Re" doesn't have to mean "reply", it can also mean "regarding". - 04/10/2011 02:01:31 PM 611 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:06:58 PM 605 Views
Re: Re: - 04/10/2011 02:12:57 PM 573 Views
Re: Also. - 04/10/2011 02:08:15 PM 615 Views
you are still using it incorrectly. *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:09:48 PM 565 Views
He's doing it on purpose though. - 04/10/2011 03:31:39 PM 670 Views
Re: Yeah, it's just a shtick... - 04/10/2011 03:47:17 PM 569 Views
Those were the good old days. - 04/10/2011 04:02:33 PM 602 Views
*NM* - 04/10/2011 10:02:30 PM 511 Views
I agree, it's driving me nuts *NM* - 04/10/2011 02:36:45 PM 496 Views
That's not quite right, actually. - 04/10/2011 03:25:54 PM 519 Views
Disagree. *NM* - 04/10/2011 10:04:09 PM 525 Views
Considering that "CaptainHammer" is LDS, I'd rather doubt he's gay. - 04/10/2011 02:32:56 AM 575 Views
Heh. Oh, Ryan. - 04/10/2011 04:36:43 PM 688 Views
*sigh* to all of you above.... - 04/10/2011 03:06:21 AM 602 Views
I thought that was "Do not talk about /b/"? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:12:52 AM 575 Views
i don't know, but if THAT is the first rule... - 04/10/2011 03:41:20 AM 548 Views
Please explain why you think we should consider you Christians. - 03/10/2011 04:33:06 PM 1041 Views
you know, that does make me wonder though - 03/10/2011 04:58:21 PM 939 Views
We're not as immovable as we are sometimes portrayed. - 03/10/2011 05:27:17 PM 912 Views
"Even Christ didn't do that"? I can't agree. - 03/10/2011 09:00:34 PM 863 Views
I conceded your last point. - 03/10/2011 10:14:28 PM 796 Views
Point of Anal Retentive Dissent: - 04/10/2011 03:54:00 PM 826 Views
That concept is alien to the Christian theological understanding, however. - 03/10/2011 10:18:55 PM 889 Views
I understand what both you and Danny are saying - 04/10/2011 12:19:57 AM 860 Views
Oh, that's very simple - 04/10/2011 04:02:24 AM 854 Views
I honestly don't know what it would take. - 04/10/2011 07:41:55 AM 886 Views
thank you, both of you - 04/10/2011 01:46:05 PM 867 Views
I love the Nicene Creed. It is such an excellent encapsulation. - 03/10/2011 06:07:53 PM 942 Views
Agreed. - 04/10/2011 04:44:49 PM 818 Views
The absolute best part about your post (plus the best thing about Mo's/LDS's) - 03/10/2011 09:02:17 PM 880 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 03/10/2011 10:10:39 PM 986 Views
Though they can cause interesting changes in patterns. - 03/10/2011 10:16:55 PM 877 Views
We believe that Jesus Christ is the Savior of all mankind, and the only way back to God. - 04/10/2011 01:29:30 AM 968 Views
If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 03:57:08 AM 1131 Views
I never said well-written, I said complex. - 04/10/2011 07:04:24 AM 996 Views
Ignore facts all you want to. - 05/10/2011 01:07:35 AM 895 Views
Re: If you think the Book of Mormon was well-written, there is really little left to discuss. - 04/10/2011 07:24:27 AM 1094 Views
Woah nelly. - 04/10/2011 10:04:33 AM 919 Views
I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 01:52:48 PM 839 Views
Re: I have to "Wow" as well... racist much? - 04/10/2011 04:42:47 PM 917 Views
oh well that makes it all better... - 04/10/2011 04:54:14 PM 941 Views
Exactly - 04/10/2011 06:00:54 PM 824 Views
Was the twin banging and the gay wedding the same event? - 04/10/2011 06:36:03 PM 906 Views
I guess this is a variation on Hams punishment; Ghav, at least should know better than to be shocked - 04/10/2011 04:13:59 PM 813 Views
it's not that we're surprised because it's "novel" - 04/10/2011 04:19:16 PM 858 Views
It is not NECESSARILY racist. - 04/10/2011 04:39:33 PM 879 Views
Sure, except ... - 04/10/2011 04:50:53 PM 897 Views
Yeah, circular logic is fun, isn't it? - 05/10/2011 01:09:25 AM 838 Views
That sounds really nice. - 04/10/2011 06:38:29 PM 854 Views
Why wait though? - 05/10/2011 12:12:21 AM 1043 Views
So that Vivien can avoid reading and thinking about the stuff that you just wrote. *NM* - 05/10/2011 12:28:23 AM 482 Views
Ack, not reading and thinking111 - 05/10/2011 12:36:11 AM 876 Views
Yeah, that's what I thought. - 06/10/2011 05:43:57 PM 775 Views
I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 06/10/2011 08:51:15 PM 1010 Views
Re: I'm satisfied by that explanation. - 07/10/2011 07:45:29 PM 878 Views
Oh no you idn't... *waves finger and weaves head* - 04/10/2011 03:53:07 AM 712 Views
....i don't know what you look like - 04/10/2011 03:54:56 AM 853 Views
Took the words right out of my mouth, repeatedly. - 04/10/2011 12:49:13 PM 1029 Views
Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 01:14:16 AM 833 Views
Hmm - 05/10/2011 02:03:13 AM 981 Views
True - 05/10/2011 02:13:00 AM 780 Views
I think of Protestantism in terms similar to a Xerox copy. - 05/10/2011 04:57:42 AM 895 Views
Maybe Xeroxes of abridged texts and dumbed down theology - 06/10/2011 02:26:58 AM 1012 Views
I like that analogy - an echo chamber! *NM* - 08/10/2011 10:44:04 PM 522 Views
Re: Off-Topic - 05/10/2011 02:56:50 AM 1005 Views
Uhh... - 05/10/2011 03:08:49 AM 820 Views
The people at the Nicene Council and the other councils were not prophets. - 05/10/2011 04:59:50 AM 938 Views
And you know that because... why, again? - 05/10/2011 07:13:53 AM 873 Views
Tough Crowd. - 03/10/2011 04:44:31 PM 964 Views
No questions. Have a nice day. - 03/10/2011 11:40:58 PM 845 Views
Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? *NM* - 04/10/2011 03:58:16 AM 609 Views
Re: Why don't they have anything approaching a formal theology? - 04/10/2011 05:23:12 PM 933 Views