Dear Ambassador Brinker,
We write to express our disappointment with Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s decision to cut funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education at Planned Parenthood health centers. This troubling decision threatens to reduce access to necessary, life-saving services. We urge Komen to reconsider its decision.
Planned Parenthood is a trusted provider of health care for women and men. More than 90 percent of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are primary and preventative including wellness exams and cancers screenings that save lives. Each year, Planned Parenthood health clinics provide 750,000 breast exams, 770,000 pap tests and nearly 4 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted diseases. Twenty percent of all women in the U.S. have visited a Planned Parenthood health center.
For the past five years, grants to local affiliates of Planned Parenthood have been an important part of Planned Parenthood’s work to protect women from breast cancer. Komen funding for Planned Parenthood has provided nearly 170,000 clinical breast exams and resulted in 6,400 referrals for mammograms. In 2011 alone, grants from Komen provided Planned Parenthood with roughly $650,000 in funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education. According to a recent statement by Komen, “In some areas of the U.S., our affiliates have determined a Planned Parenthood clinic to be the best or only local place where women can receive breast health care.”
It would be tragic if any woman —let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially life-saving screenings because of a politically motivated attack.
We earnestly hope that you will put women’s health before partisan politics and reconsider this decision for the sake of the women who depend on both your organizations for access to the health care they need.
The letter is signed by Senators Lautenberg, Murray, Mikulski, Boxer, Cantwell, Gillibrand, Menendez, Wyden, Blumenthal, Shaheen, Begich, merkley, Tester, Akaka, Sanders, (Sherrod) Brown, Leahy, Baucus, Cardin, Feinstein, Franken, and Kerry.
Emphasis mine on 'partisan politics' because I find that horribly ironic in a letter signed by members of only one party.
Obviously the content of the deliberately public letter contains no threatening or inappropriate language, and I think we can skip formal analysis of it. I'm quite sure most of the signatories are speaking honestly and passionately here anyway, my issue is with them sending it at all.
One can usually rely on someone grabbing a shovel anyway
I'm not accusing them of anything illegal here, even on the off chance someone violated one of the various arcane rules. I'm not questioning their intent either. It is political pressure, and its directed at a private charity. I don't want throw too much mud but imagine if a major Rape charity cut funding to self-defense courses because the local dojo also ran a pistol range. I'd think it pretty screwed up if half the GOP senators wrote a public letter to them, and I'm pretty sure media reaction would be negative.
I won't deny Komen played a role in their own current mess, I'm just expressing generalized bitterness and cynicism about how good causes get hijacked, worsened by the fact that from a realistic perspective its often the best thing for the cause. I've no real fingers to point at anyone, this is just a dumb thing which happened.
We write to express our disappointment with Susan G. Komen for the Cure’s decision to cut funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education at Planned Parenthood health centers. This troubling decision threatens to reduce access to necessary, life-saving services. We urge Komen to reconsider its decision.
Planned Parenthood is a trusted provider of health care for women and men. More than 90 percent of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are primary and preventative including wellness exams and cancers screenings that save lives. Each year, Planned Parenthood health clinics provide 750,000 breast exams, 770,000 pap tests and nearly 4 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted diseases. Twenty percent of all women in the U.S. have visited a Planned Parenthood health center.
For the past five years, grants to local affiliates of Planned Parenthood have been an important part of Planned Parenthood’s work to protect women from breast cancer. Komen funding for Planned Parenthood has provided nearly 170,000 clinical breast exams and resulted in 6,400 referrals for mammograms. In 2011 alone, grants from Komen provided Planned Parenthood with roughly $650,000 in funding for breast cancer prevention, screening, and education. According to a recent statement by Komen, “In some areas of the U.S., our affiliates have determined a Planned Parenthood clinic to be the best or only local place where women can receive breast health care.”
It would be tragic if any woman —let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially life-saving screenings because of a politically motivated attack.
We earnestly hope that you will put women’s health before partisan politics and reconsider this decision for the sake of the women who depend on both your organizations for access to the health care they need.
The letter is signed by Senators Lautenberg, Murray, Mikulski, Boxer, Cantwell, Gillibrand, Menendez, Wyden, Blumenthal, Shaheen, Begich, merkley, Tester, Akaka, Sanders, (Sherrod) Brown, Leahy, Baucus, Cardin, Feinstein, Franken, and Kerry.
Emphasis mine on 'partisan politics' because I find that horribly ironic in a letter signed by members of only one party.
Obviously the content of the deliberately public letter contains no threatening or inappropriate language, and I think we can skip formal analysis of it. I'm quite sure most of the signatories are speaking honestly and passionately here anyway, my issue is with them sending it at all.
Trying to appease all sides is usually a spectacular failure; one would have thought Obama had proven that (as big a football fan as he supposedly is one would have thought someone told him to dance with the one who brung him; oh, well.) At this point, their best bet is probably to shut up for a while and let things die down a bit before any more statements, since anything and everything they say now will just make it worse. The rule, though it can be demanding of ones discipline, is that when in a hole one should STOP DIGGING.
One can usually rely on someone grabbing a shovel anyway

Maybe I am cutting it too finely, but it makes a difference to me whether they used stamps or franking privileges. Senators should be allowed personal feelings and personal appeals apart from their offices so long as they do not involve the office. It sounds like these did, which would make it political pressure; not sure though.
I'm not accusing them of anything illegal here, even on the off chance someone violated one of the various arcane rules. I'm not questioning their intent either. It is political pressure, and its directed at a private charity. I don't want throw too much mud but imagine if a major Rape charity cut funding to self-defense courses because the local dojo also ran a pistol range. I'd think it pretty screwed up if half the GOP senators wrote a public letter to them, and I'm pretty sure media reaction would be negative.
Nature of the beast, but Komen set themselves up for it. Again, we should not pretend the decision happened in a vacuum. Also once again, I am forced to wonder why Komen bothered funding cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood in the first place since it seems to have made this day inevitable. Perhaps it was not inevitable from the start, but a certain small but vocal element within a certain political party made it so due to that partys connections with Komens founder. In that event, I am back to my last response to rt: However this ends, whether it was a political matter was decided the moment Komen made their first announcement (and the subsequent one you linked pretty much says that outright, without stating specific causes.)
I won't deny Komen played a role in their own current mess, I'm just expressing generalized bitterness and cynicism about how good causes get hijacked, worsened by the fact that from a realistic perspective its often the best thing for the cause. I've no real fingers to point at anyone, this is just a dumb thing which happened.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 04/02/2012 at 12:03:45 AM
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
- 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
2442 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
- 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
1313 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
1190 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
- 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
1194 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
- 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
1160 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
- 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
1269 Views
That is a little unfair.
- 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
1490 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
- 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
1244 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
- 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
1171 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
- 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
1167 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
- 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
1211 Views
It worries me when we think alike....
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1253 Views
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1253 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
- 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
1336 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
- 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
1247 Views
Oh please.
- 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
1195 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
- 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
1067 Views
Quite a telling reply.
- 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
1170 Views
Re: I quite agree.
- 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
1366 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
- 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
1189 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
- 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
1248 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
- 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
1512 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
- 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
1265 Views
You continue to miss the point.
- 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
1355 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
- 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
1281 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
- 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
1348 Views
Well, yes.
- 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
1278 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
- 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
1179 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
1284 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
1343 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
1197 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
1030 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
1220 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
1161 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
- 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
1292 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
1392 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
1236 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
1263 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
1353 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
1243 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
1566 Views
There are problems with the implants
- 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
1233 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
- 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
1241 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
578 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
578 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
- 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
1146 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
- 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
1188 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
- 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
1371 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
1159 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
- 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
1206 Views
Right
- 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1265 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
- 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
1127 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
- 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
1180 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
- 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
1102 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
- 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
1227 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1197 Views
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1197 Views
Just curious...
- 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
1168 Views
Not at all.
- 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
1228 Views
Not at all?
- 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
1143 Views
No.
- 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
1071 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
1169 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
1166 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1152 Views
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1152 Views
Ooor, the best.
- 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
1139 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
687 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
640 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
- 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
1239 Views
You don't know stuff.
- 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
1228 Views
I know the stuff that matters.
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1111 Views
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1111 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
- 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
1255 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
- 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
1305 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
- 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
1225 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
727 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
- 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
1251 Views
Re: stuff
- 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
1119 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
- 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
1175 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
- 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
1259 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
- 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
1109 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
1233 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
1112 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
- 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
1050 Views
They restored funding incidentally
- 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
1138 Views
Unless I've missed it
- 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
1189 Views
You must have missed it then
- 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
1139 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
- 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
1290 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
- 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
1170 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
1212 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
1390 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1308 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
1080 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
- 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
1118 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
- 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
1193 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
- 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
1238 Views
Judge for yourself
- 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
1249 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
- 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
1168 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
- 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
1280 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
- 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
1133 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
- 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
1206 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1235 Views
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1235 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
- 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
1155 Views


*NM*