You seem very opinionated about a group you obviously know very little about. All your little assertions about what this groups believes and why they believe is really amusing. The funny thing is your self-righteous rants and your proclamations about other people’s motives remind me of the more unhinged Christians fanatics I know. They tell me that the pro-choicers don’t really care about choice or women’s health they just want to be able to kill unwanted babies. That if they could get away with they would let mother’s drown them at birth if they wanted to. You are pretty much the pro-choice version of that.
I know you really don’t care how offense to some people what you have been saying might be since you have your righteousness to justify it but you really come off as a self important blow hard talking out his ass about subjects he doesn't really know much about. Stick to trying to describe what you believe and you might do better.
By the way the way a zygote is alive by any definition of the word that hasn't been politicized and it is a human so there for it is a human life. I know people have come with some contrived definitions of life that would rule out zygotes but those are political constructs and have nothing to do with science. I have yet to see anyone come with a valid definition of life that doesn’t include the entire life cycle of an organism. Zygote is a stage in life cycle of humans and a zygote is no less human than any other human in any other stage. Now you can argue that is a human life without value but saying which humans get to live and which should die based on their value is a very dangerous game. The list of the unworhty can grow.
Personally I am on the fence on the whole issue I just found your bad logic and your flawed proclamations about what other people felt annoying. The problem is there are valid arguments to made on both sides but the less opened minded and more radical on both sides are to blinded by the light of the surety to see they create strawmen to fight and feel reassured when they beat those stawmen.
I know you really don’t care how offense to some people what you have been saying might be since you have your righteousness to justify it but you really come off as a self important blow hard talking out his ass about subjects he doesn't really know much about. Stick to trying to describe what you believe and you might do better.
By the way the way a zygote is alive by any definition of the word that hasn't been politicized and it is a human so there for it is a human life. I know people have come with some contrived definitions of life that would rule out zygotes but those are political constructs and have nothing to do with science. I have yet to see anyone come with a valid definition of life that doesn’t include the entire life cycle of an organism. Zygote is a stage in life cycle of humans and a zygote is no less human than any other human in any other stage. Now you can argue that is a human life without value but saying which humans get to live and which should die based on their value is a very dangerous game. The list of the unworhty can grow.
Personally I am on the fence on the whole issue I just found your bad logic and your flawed proclamations about what other people felt annoying. The problem is there are valid arguments to made on both sides but the less opened minded and more radical on both sides are to blinded by the light of the surety to see they create strawmen to fight and feel reassured when they beat those stawmen.
Susan G. Komen cuts funds to Planned Parenthood. (with updated edit)
- 02/02/2012 04:32:27 PM
2487 Views
The most annoying part is in the sixth paragraph- abortions are only a small part of their thing
- 02/02/2012 05:08:07 PM
1358 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 05:20:17 PM
1242 Views
Actually, there are longer-acting forms of birth control than the pill.
- 03/02/2012 12:37:42 AM
1234 Views
I do think that preventing abortions is their primary goal.
- 03/02/2012 01:08:05 AM
1194 Views
If they don't see that link, it's because they haven't looked.
- 03/02/2012 02:42:42 AM
1316 Views
That is a little unfair.
- 03/02/2012 12:48:46 PM
1554 Views
Won't someone please think of the children?!
- 04/02/2012 05:03:27 AM
1292 Views
I think you're leaving out some important points.
- 04/02/2012 03:40:48 PM
1203 Views
Ah, the good ol' silent majority.
- 04/02/2012 07:32:29 PM
1216 Views
So which moron is feeding you this crap?
- 04/02/2012 10:27:15 PM
1249 Views
It worries me when we think alike....
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1303 Views
- 05/02/2012 01:22:35 PM
1303 Views
Brain waves at 8 weeks are a myth.
- 05/02/2012 08:46:06 PM
1383 Views
"brain function... appears to be reliably present in the fetus at about eight weeks' gestation."
- 05/02/2012 10:42:35 PM
1294 Views
Oh please.
- 05/02/2012 11:13:50 PM
1248 Views
Re: Oh please yourself.
- 06/02/2012 09:15:26 PM
1105 Views
Quite a telling reply.
- 07/02/2012 04:38:20 AM
1216 Views
Re: I quite agree.
- 08/02/2012 06:03:23 PM
1408 Views
You're taking an issue of objective facts and treating it like a day of playground gossip.
- 09/02/2012 03:47:06 AM
1234 Views
No, your source, in which there is very little that is objective, did that for me.
- 11/02/2012 02:59:45 AM
1279 Views
I see you have continued to provide no factual arguments.
- 14/02/2012 04:53:28 AM
1555 Views
I presented factual rebuttals.
- 19/02/2012 01:56:45 AM
1310 Views
You continue to miss the point.
- 23/02/2012 10:22:24 PM
1396 Views
No, I got the point: You expect me to accept a heavily biased, partisan and combative "source."
- 07/03/2012 01:47:37 AM
1327 Views
The claim of brain waves at 8 weeks is still unsupported by evidence, i.e. a myth.
- 15/03/2012 09:16:14 PM
1385 Views
Well, yes.
- 04/02/2012 11:14:47 PM
1344 Views
A silent majority may as well not exist, if it has no tangible effects.
- 05/02/2012 12:54:34 AM
1213 Views
You ignoring it is not the same thing as it having no tangible effect.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:36 AM
1329 Views
Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 04/02/2012 08:25:49 PM
1384 Views
Re: Since few people oppose ADULT contraception access, that might be wise in this case.
- 05/02/2012 02:11:28 AM
1246 Views
If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 08:42:17 AM
1074 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 05/02/2012 10:04:59 PM
1260 Views
Re: If you are arguing most sex ed opponents are naïve/ignorant, I agree.
- 06/02/2012 08:57:38 PM
1198 Views
I'm done discussing my use of the term "oppression." The Tim Ryan stuff is interesting, though.
- 07/02/2012 05:37:05 AM
1330 Views
Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 08/02/2012 06:01:32 PM
1448 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 09/02/2012 05:30:58 AM
1284 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 11/02/2012 02:58:00 AM
1308 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 14/02/2012 04:29:08 AM
1390 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 19/02/2012 01:54:30 AM
1277 Views
Re: Yet, regrettably, not done misusing it.
- 23/02/2012 10:59:32 PM
1607 Views
There are problems with the implants
- 03/02/2012 01:42:55 AM
1271 Views
Any form of birth control doesn't work for everyone, though.
- 03/02/2012 02:37:00 AM
1291 Views
Oh yes, I totally agree! My point is just that there are some barriers to handing out implants
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
600 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2012 03:38:05 AM
600 Views
What on earth does that have to do with anything?
- 03/02/2012 01:47:42 AM
1180 Views
I was actually kinda with you until you closed with that anathema I condemned in my response to rt.
- 03/02/2012 01:39:06 PM
1242 Views
I agree that they have made Beast Cancer a cult but splitting with PP is just smart
- 02/02/2012 05:39:49 PM
1432 Views
I agree.
- 02/02/2012 06:00:17 PM
1215 Views
yes she is going to have to piss off one group or the other
- 02/02/2012 06:12:31 PM
1259 Views
Right
- 02/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1301 Views
it is a judgment call and I hope her decision is based on more than my guesses
- 02/02/2012 06:53:50 PM
1166 Views
Do you see a way Komen could have avoided pissing off one side?
- 02/02/2012 06:55:36 PM
1227 Views
No, I don't. I don't believe I said that?
- 02/02/2012 07:53:50 PM
1143 Views
You didn't; I inferred it from the way you phrased that ("if she HAS to..."). Sorry.
- 02/02/2012 08:06:11 PM
1270 Views
I know I'm not always clear.
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1245 Views
- 02/02/2012 08:32:47 PM
1245 Views
Just curious...
- 02/02/2012 10:07:49 PM
1217 Views
Not at all.
- 02/02/2012 10:24:19 PM
1260 Views
Not at all?
- 02/02/2012 10:32:31 PM
1175 Views
No.
- 02/02/2012 10:47:04 PM
1113 Views
My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 02/02/2012 11:17:24 PM
1214 Views
Re: My argument is based on my belief that the pro-choice women are more dedicated to women's causes
- 03/02/2012 12:08:01 AM
1213 Views
wow that may be the worst advice I had in weeks
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1200 Views
- 03/02/2012 12:13:18 AM
1200 Views
Ooor, the best.
- 03/02/2012 12:25:56 AM
1186 Views
ok now you are just being mean *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:46:12 AM
713 Views
The thread was going too well - I thought we needed the meanness. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 11:30:39 AM
659 Views
Never having heard of any of those except PP, my opinion may not be the most relevant...
- 02/02/2012 08:32:48 PM
1283 Views
You don't know stuff.
- 02/02/2012 08:43:38 PM
1264 Views
I know the stuff that matters.
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1156 Views
- 02/02/2012 09:55:08 PM
1156 Views
they may also be a afraid that PP will go the way of ACORN
- 02/02/2012 11:04:16 PM
1304 Views
"Accused" of = unfounded slander.
- 03/02/2012 12:13:30 AM
1345 Views
did you notice I called tactic disgusting? That doesn't mean it isn't effective
- 03/02/2012 12:45:10 AM
1266 Views
The investigation by Congress is well-known to be specious. It's the House GOP abusing their power. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 12:41:58 AM
744 Views
This is so foreign a debate for me
- 02/02/2012 10:16:15 PM
1293 Views
Re: stuff
- 03/02/2012 09:18:53 AM
1157 Views
I'm sorry, but what're we talking about when we're talking about "cancer"
- 03/02/2012 12:49:34 PM
1219 Views
Obviously not adenocarcinoma, no.
- 04/02/2012 07:36:06 AM
1300 Views
I"m not that fussed. I'm just generally leary of research that has results like that
- 04/02/2012 08:35:04 PM
1158 Views
Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 10:54:34 PM
1280 Views
Re: Once I looked up Nancy Brinker at Wikipedia it all made sense.
- 02/02/2012 11:03:32 PM
1152 Views
After a little more digging I have to say you are probably right.
- 03/02/2012 02:23:14 AM
1099 Views
They restored funding incidentally
- 03/02/2012 05:43:47 PM
1179 Views
Unless I've missed it
- 03/02/2012 05:56:15 PM
1237 Views
You must have missed it then
- 03/02/2012 07:07:13 PM
1185 Views
If you're referring to Cannoli
- 03/02/2012 07:19:25 PM
1348 Views
Multiple was not an accidental choice of words
- 03/02/2012 11:46:30 PM
1206 Views
Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 12:41:42 AM
1238 Views
Re: Then I agree that maybe this is not the thread for you.
- 04/02/2012 01:53:25 AM
1451 Views
well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:24:14 PM
1349 Views
Re: well at least there will not be any doubt about this being a political decision
- 03/02/2012 06:29:34 PM
1136 Views
I do wonder a bit which lawmakers Fox thinks "pressured" Komen.
- 03/02/2012 08:29:50 PM
1174 Views
Beyond the 26 senators, I'd imagine rumor of the more reliable sort
- 03/02/2012 08:46:31 PM
1232 Views
Well, if they wrote AS senators rather than friends of Nancy Brinker, that probably qualifies.
- 03/02/2012 10:24:11 PM
1268 Views
Judge for yourself
- 04/02/2012 12:01:06 AM
1292 Views
Well, a public letter makes whether they signed it "Sen. so-and-so" irrelevant: It is political.
- 04/02/2012 04:07:20 PM
1213 Views
are you trying to disprove the study you posted?
- 03/02/2012 09:20:12 PM
1336 Views
To me, it depends on the nature of the contact, which I have not dug enough to discover.
- 03/02/2012 10:43:45 PM
1171 Views
you admit you have no incite into what happened
- 04/02/2012 04:27:17 AM
1247 Views
Actually, it looks like Komens new VP (and former GOP GA gubernatorial candidate) had the incite.
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1277 Views
- 04/02/2012 04:24:14 PM
1277 Views
educated guess don't work when you are tinfoil hat wearing kool-aid drinker
- 04/02/2012 09:33:49 PM
1205 Views


*NM*