Active Users:395 Time:12/05/2025 02:06:10 PM
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well Larry Send a noteboard - 22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM
I think she became a proponent of Gnosticism quite some time ago, and now she writes the same book over and over again, which can be summed up as, "Christianity isn't what you think it is. It's all about you, and the terrible Church hierarchy wants to keep you down and hold you back." It's a very New-Age sort of spin on Christianity that even the ancient Gnostics would probably not approve of.

As such, she's "all in" on Gnostic Christianity being the "authentic" Christianity. I think most scholars would disagree with a First Century composition for Thomas, and certainly few would argue that John is responding to Thomas.


Like I said, I was skeptical of the claims I cited, but I could see where a 90-130 publication is plausible. I think I can already presume that you think even less of the Robert W. Funk group, right?
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
So, about this silly "Jesus' wife" story making the rounds... - 19/09/2012 10:55:55 PM 1316 Views
That's right! Jesus' position on marriage was "One man, no woman." *NM* - 19/09/2012 11:05:55 PM 590 Views
What is the context? The canonical bible says Christ has a wife: The Church. - 19/09/2012 11:25:19 PM 951 Views
Oh please...don't confuse "wife" with "bride" - 19/09/2012 11:35:09 PM 923 Views
What word do the Prophets use for Israels relationship to God? - 20/09/2012 12:38:20 AM 898 Views
BRIDE - 20/09/2012 03:39:30 PM 884 Views
Two things why it is important - 20/09/2012 04:24:37 AM 875 Views
There is a very good reason no one dismissed the illegitmate gospels as illegitimate until 180 AD: - 20/09/2012 09:15:05 PM 836 Views
The Gospel of Thomas was written before 180 AD. - 20/09/2012 09:33:44 PM 828 Views
What is the oldest extant text of or reference to it? - 20/09/2012 11:11:03 PM 905 Views
The Oxyrhynchus fragments were dated to c. 200 AD, and they are copies - 21/09/2012 12:18:33 AM 823 Views
I would buy 200 AD, of course. - 21/09/2012 12:58:32 AM 883 Views
It's not about "buying" it - it's essentially proven at that point. - 21/09/2012 03:26:50 AM 856 Views
Yes; all I meant was that I never disputed a date around 200 AD. - 22/09/2012 12:25:41 AM 874 Views
I don't think any of the gospels were written by their purported authors. - 22/09/2012 03:36:32 AM 788 Views
Not even Mark or Luke? - 22/09/2012 01:21:24 PM 835 Views
Well, but everyone knew Peter didn't speak Greek - 22/09/2012 09:46:57 PM 774 Views
What about those who postulate a mid-to-late 1st century composition? - 22/09/2012 02:21:18 AM 899 Views
Elaine Pagels ceased to be an impartial academic a long time ago. - 22/09/2012 03:41:41 AM 859 Views
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well - 22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM 997 Views
Let's not get started on Funk - 22/09/2012 09:48:05 PM 791 Views
So true - 22/09/2012 10:23:08 PM 897 Views
don't these people have anything better to do? - 20/09/2012 11:39:35 PM 833 Views
Clearly not. - 22/09/2012 12:27:29 AM 735 Views
then i'll escape this thread before anyone twigs - 22/09/2012 08:12:37 PM 907 Views
Too late, I have already twigged, branched and treed. - 22/09/2012 08:58:39 PM 878 Views
I know! - 21/09/2012 06:48:33 AM 1012 Views
See, Tom, you made a mistake. - 22/09/2012 10:25:22 AM 866 Views

Reply to Message