Even if the school did have rules against PDAs at the prom, what makes you think this girl would have followed them? She was already trying to violate the dress code policy. Why assume she wouldn't try and violate the "no PDAs" policy?
It's not like she just showed up and expected to be let in. Going through a process/appeal to try to change the rules actually demonstrates respect for said rules.
Your argument is basically like saying that a legislator who has proposed an amendment to fix something he disagrees with can't be trusted to adhere to other existing laws.
It's like saying that a legislator wants to change two anti-speeding laws. We should let them because it won't mess things up too badly. After all, there will still be one anti-speeding law left on the books after he has had his way, preventing things from getting too dangerous.
Even if that one law were indeed enough to keep things safe on the roads, such thinking will do little to reassure his opponents. After all, he has already shown himself quite willing to challenge two anti-speeding laws. What makes us think that he, or someone else, won't now challenge the third?
My point is that saying it won't screw things up to change two long standing rules because "there are rules" to keep things from getting too uncomfortable is a hollow reassurance to those opposed to it. If two rules go, others can go too.
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date
- 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM
1802 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM
290 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM
924 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM
756 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM
757 Views
What???
- 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM
827 Views
Actually...
- 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM
846 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense.
- 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM
768 Views
That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM
822 Views
Er...
- 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM
702 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM
769 Views
...
- 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM
689 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt."
- 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM
703 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that.
- 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM
754 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say?
- 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM
646 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM
708 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong.
- 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM
739 Views
Re: This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 02:31:06 PM
784 Views
Why don't you show me where I said marriage is holy OR made a religious argument, you imbecile?
- 12/03/2010 10:32:42 PM
748 Views
actually, i thought i read that it was because she wanted to wear a tux instead of a dress
- 12/03/2010 02:46:00 AM
774 Views
Kind of a different can of worms then
- 12/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
709 Views
What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 14/03/2010 01:24:47 AM
706 Views
Hmm. Apparently it is legal to discriminate upon the basis of gender. Imagine that.
- 14/03/2010 02:45:51 AM
687 Views
It kind of makes sense, given the highly arbitrary and stereotypical nature of gender.
- 14/03/2010 03:35:44 AM
623 Views
Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
743 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO
- 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM
778 Views
Maybe.
- 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM
780 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters"
- 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM
703 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here.
- 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM
683 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt...
- 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM
744 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM
717 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM
711 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under
- 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM
605 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under
- 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
759 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux"
- 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM
649 Views
For the record...
- 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM
695 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM
743 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM
758 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM
731 Views
No no, I know how you feel. I'm just disinclined to have sympathy for the school.
- 12/03/2010 11:28:35 PM
605 Views
Alternatively, I have little sympathy for the school, I just don't have much for her either
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
722 Views
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
722 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit?
- 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM
705 Views
Regardless of "rights" invovled, I don't see why she shouldn't be able to go as she pleases.
- 12/03/2010 05:25:31 PM
749 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend
- 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM
826 Views
Another thing I think people should remember -
- 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM
824 Views
One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM
748 Views
Re: One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM
812 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance
- 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM
636 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much?
- 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM
611 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else
- 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM
672 Views
It does
- 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM
656 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM
609 Views
I typically agree with you
- 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM
713 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM
650 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM
711 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM
588 Views
He wasn't neccessarily advocating it. He was translating what they were doing into something that
- 16/03/2010 01:37:59 AM
677 Views
I'd argue that that kind of hypocrisy is invaluable in today's world, actually.
- 16/03/2010 01:46:16 AM
651 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM
685 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
607 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM
804 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM*
- 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM
456 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened
- 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM
595 Views
