Active Users:1633 Time:02/08/2026 12:24:13 PM
Re: It does nossy Send a noteboard - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
We're not talking about pants though, we're talking about a tuxedo. I know that girls tend to have looser definitions of what clothing is gender appropriate, but the rules for even their clothing are more restrictive in formal settings and tuxedos especially are still viewed as male attire. Plus, when we have a situation of a lesbian wanting to wear one and take her dress-wearing female date to the prom, the possibility that it is indeed cross dressing becomes much stronger than the possibility that I'm cross dressing because I'm wearing jeans right now rather than a skirt.

Plus, I agree with Issac. Dress codes exists for a reason. Make an exception in this case, and what else will you be forced to make an exception for? Men in skirts? People in causal attire? Tube tops? Where do you draw the line?

See above. Process and procedures to change rules exist for a reason as well.;) I don't care much about the tuxedo/cross-dressing argument, but I do care that the school claimed that canceling the prom would be less disruptive to education than allowing a same-sex couple to attend together. If they want the rules, they should stand up for the rules on their own merits. If they are good rules, they will be easily supportable (as some of the points you listed above), but if they don't stand up well when they come up against real discussion, well then...

Instead, it was a cop out decision, and puts immense weight onto a teenager's shoulders. Good thing she's almost ready to graduate- some of those kids would make her life hell.
Reply to message
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date - 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM 1921 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM 322 Views
Not ALL of the US. There were same-sex couples at my prom. *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:26:24 AM 367 Views
Yeah, don't worry, I know it's not like that everywhere. - 12/03/2010 09:15:43 AM 741 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage. - 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM 1003 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM 831 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM 838 Views
Ummmm.... no. - 12/03/2010 11:02:50 PM 851 Views
i totally agree 100% with what you're saying - 12/03/2010 02:33:55 AM 965 Views
What??? - 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM 925 Views
Actually... - 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM 928 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense. - 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM 841 Views
That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM 898 Views
Er... - 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM 780 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM 845 Views
... - 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM 770 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt." - 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM 786 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that. - 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM 836 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say? - 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM 735 Views
Again, you're right. - 12/03/2010 03:59:13 PM 704 Views
Yup. - 12/03/2010 04:02:26 PM 810 Views
Not really. Her point is that they should both be illegal. - 12/03/2010 07:01:47 PM 740 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM 794 Views
And when the school refused to change it's policy... - 12/03/2010 03:25:03 PM 731 Views
Absurd. - 12/03/2010 08:27:19 PM 811 Views
The rules were unjust. - 13/03/2010 05:09:59 AM 843 Views
Wow, talk about proving my point! - 12/03/2010 11:04:34 PM 953 Views
So hang on. - 13/03/2010 05:04:58 AM 831 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong. - 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM 805 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO - 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM 862 Views
Maybe. - 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM 863 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM 782 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 01:53:39 PM 810 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 03:04:43 PM 771 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here. - 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM 764 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt... - 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM 830 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM 798 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM 796 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under - 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM 683 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under - 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM 838 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux" - 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM 732 Views
Your comments are inconsistent - 15/03/2010 02:09:43 AM 790 Views
I think you're optimistic about what her chances would've been - 12/03/2010 07:13:38 PM 786 Views
For the record... - 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM 790 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM 837 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM 850 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM 815 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit? - 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM 787 Views
Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 01:46:23 PM 790 Views
Re: Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 07:25:41 PM 875 Views
I have issues with both sides, I think - 12/03/2010 02:44:06 PM 755 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend - 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM 912 Views
Another thing I think people should remember - - 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM 902 Views
One point though - 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM 822 Views
Re: One point though - 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM 889 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance - 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM 724 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much? - 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM 688 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else - 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM 751 Views
It does - 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM 736 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM 676 Views
I typically agree with you - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM 792 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM 735 Views
yah, but at this point, how much of it is the girl? - 13/03/2010 10:24:57 PM 697 Views
Is she a child or an adult? IIRC she's 18 - 13/03/2010 11:33:39 PM 751 Views
No, it should not - 14/03/2010 12:33:56 AM 950 Views
Re: No, it should not - 14/03/2010 01:16:33 AM 864 Views
I understood that. You explained it well. *NM* - 14/03/2010 03:28:10 AM 342 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM 787 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM 675 Views
This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 04:27:43 AM 824 Views
Re: This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 05:18:11 AM 1066 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM 778 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM 692 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM 892 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:11:11 AM 789 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 03:42:06 AM 822 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:47:47 AM 837 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 04:09:18 AM 801 Views
You make good points. *NM* - 15/03/2010 08:08:37 PM 313 Views
Ah, yes, "the rules." - 15/03/2010 01:47:31 AM 730 Views
Read my replies to Nossy and Ghavrel - 15/03/2010 05:01:29 AM 797 Views
Slippery slope arguments are stupid. - 14/03/2010 12:43:00 AM 677 Views
So is likening everythng back to the Civil Rights Movement - 14/03/2010 04:17:54 AM 834 Views
"Dress codes exists for a reason?" - 15/03/2010 01:43:36 AM 737 Views
They do - 15/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 855 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM* - 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM 495 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened - 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM 675 Views
Teenaged lesbians - 15/03/2010 06:55:12 AM 789 Views

Reply to Message