We're not talking about pants though, we're talking about a tuxedo. I know that girls tend to have looser definitions of what clothing is gender appropriate, but the rules for even their clothing are more restrictive in formal settings and tuxedos especially are still viewed as male attire. Plus, when we have a situation of a lesbian wanting to wear one and take her dress-wearing female date to the prom, the possibility that it is indeed cross dressing becomes much stronger than the possibility that I'm cross dressing because I'm wearing jeans right now rather than a skirt.
Plus, I agree with Issac. Dress codes exists for a reason. Make an exception in this case, and what else will you be forced to make an exception for? Men in skirts? People in causal attire? Tube tops? Where do you draw the line?
Plus, I agree with Issac. Dress codes exists for a reason. Make an exception in this case, and what else will you be forced to make an exception for? Men in skirts? People in causal attire? Tube tops? Where do you draw the line?
See above. Process and procedures to change rules exist for a reason as well.
I don't care much about the tuxedo/cross-dressing argument, but I do care that the school claimed that canceling the prom would be less disruptive to education than allowing a same-sex couple to attend together. If they want the rules, they should stand up for the rules on their own merits. If they are good rules, they will be easily supportable (as some of the points you listed above), but if they don't stand up well when they come up against real discussion, well then...Instead, it was a cop out decision, and puts immense weight onto a teenager's shoulders. Good thing she's almost ready to graduate- some of those kids would make her life hell.
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date
- 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM
1866 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM
299 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM
948 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM
780 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with.
- 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM
784 Views
What???
- 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM
864 Views
Actually...
- 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM
871 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense.
- 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM
788 Views
That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM
851 Views
Er...
- 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM
724 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM
792 Views
...
- 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM
720 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt."
- 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM
733 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that.
- 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM
782 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say?
- 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM
683 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt.
- 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM
740 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong.
- 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM
760 Views
Re: This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage.
- 12/03/2010 02:31:06 PM
804 Views
Why don't you show me where I said marriage is holy OR made a religious argument, you imbecile?
- 12/03/2010 10:32:42 PM
773 Views
actually, i thought i read that it was because she wanted to wear a tux instead of a dress
- 12/03/2010 02:46:00 AM
802 Views
Kind of a different can of worms then
- 12/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
749 Views
What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 14/03/2010 01:24:47 AM
733 Views
Hmm. Apparently it is legal to discriminate upon the basis of gender. Imagine that.
- 14/03/2010 02:45:51 AM
720 Views
It kind of makes sense, given the highly arbitrary and stereotypical nature of gender.
- 14/03/2010 03:35:44 AM
650 Views
Re: What?! Now that is a can of worms I could see getting in a fight over.
- 15/03/2010 02:01:00 AM
769 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO
- 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM
807 Views
Maybe.
- 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM
804 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters"
- 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM
726 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here.
- 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM
714 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt...
- 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM
775 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM
754 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology"
- 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM
743 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under
- 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM
629 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under
- 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM
787 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux"
- 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM
674 Views
For the record...
- 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM
733 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM
774 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM
794 Views
Re: For the record...
- 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM
761 Views
No no, I know how you feel. I'm just disinclined to have sympathy for the school.
- 12/03/2010 11:28:35 PM
632 Views
Alternatively, I have little sympathy for the school, I just don't have much for her either
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
746 Views
- 12/03/2010 11:56:08 PM
746 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit?
- 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM
733 Views
Regardless of "rights" invovled, I don't see why she shouldn't be able to go as she pleases.
- 12/03/2010 05:25:31 PM
780 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend
- 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM
853 Views
Another thing I think people should remember -
- 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM
850 Views
One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM
772 Views
Re: One point though
- 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM
832 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance
- 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM
664 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much?
- 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM
635 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else
- 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM
699 Views
It does
- 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM
686 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM
632 Views
I typically agree with you
- 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM
738 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM
679 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM
738 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory
- 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM
617 Views
He wasn't neccessarily advocating it. He was translating what they were doing into something that
- 16/03/2010 01:37:59 AM
698 Views
I'd argue that that kind of hypocrisy is invaluable in today's world, actually.
- 16/03/2010 01:46:16 AM
684 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM
724 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
637 Views
Re: It does
- 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM
833 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM*
- 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM
470 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened
- 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM
624 Views
