Active Users:612 Time:19/03/2026 11:06:53 AM
Re: It does nossy Send a noteboard - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM
We're not talking about pants though, we're talking about a tuxedo. I know that girls tend to have looser definitions of what clothing is gender appropriate, but the rules for even their clothing are more restrictive in formal settings and tuxedos especially are still viewed as male attire. Plus, when we have a situation of a lesbian wanting to wear one and take her dress-wearing female date to the prom, the possibility that it is indeed cross dressing becomes much stronger than the possibility that I'm cross dressing because I'm wearing jeans right now rather than a skirt.

Plus, I agree with Issac. Dress codes exists for a reason. Make an exception in this case, and what else will you be forced to make an exception for? Men in skirts? People in causal attire? Tube tops? Where do you draw the line?

See above. Process and procedures to change rules exist for a reason as well.;) I don't care much about the tuxedo/cross-dressing argument, but I do care that the school claimed that canceling the prom would be less disruptive to education than allowing a same-sex couple to attend together. If they want the rules, they should stand up for the rules on their own merits. If they are good rules, they will be easily supportable (as some of the points you listed above), but if they don't stand up well when they come up against real discussion, well then...

Instead, it was a cop out decision, and puts immense weight onto a teenager's shoulders. Good thing she's almost ready to graduate- some of those kids would make her life hell.
Reply to message
Mississippi High School cancels Prom after Lesbian Student Wanted to Bring a Girl as Her Date - 11/03/2010 11:56:10 PM 1866 Views
Seriously, wtf is wrong with the US? *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:08:32 AM 299 Views
Not ALL of the US. There were same-sex couples at my prom. *NM* - 12/03/2010 12:26:24 AM 341 Views
Yeah, don't worry, I know it's not like that everywhere. - 12/03/2010 09:15:43 AM 696 Views
This is the problem with liberals and their crusades like gay marriage. - 12/03/2010 12:50:12 AM 945 Views
Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 02:03:32 AM 778 Views
Re: Just a few things that I know you'll proabably disagree with. - 12/03/2010 10:12:04 PM 782 Views
Ummmm.... no. - 12/03/2010 11:02:50 PM 794 Views
i totally agree 100% with what you're saying - 12/03/2010 02:33:55 AM 900 Views
What??? - 12/03/2010 02:53:13 AM 863 Views
Actually... - 12/03/2010 04:56:03 AM 871 Views
Oh, it is definitely self-defense. - 12/03/2010 05:52:50 AM 787 Views
That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 06:10:27 AM 848 Views
Er... - 12/03/2010 06:45:05 AM 722 Views
I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 01:39:19 PM 790 Views
... - 12/03/2010 02:05:54 PM 718 Views
I think you mean "I'm afraid that again that analogy is not apt." - 12/03/2010 02:45:23 PM 731 Views
That's right, I forgot to add that. - 12/03/2010 03:23:25 PM 780 Views
It's a rather key piece of any attempted analogy, wouldn't you say? - 12/03/2010 03:45:15 PM 679 Views
Again, you're right. - 12/03/2010 03:59:13 PM 655 Views
Yup. - 12/03/2010 04:02:26 PM 757 Views
Not really. Her point is that they should both be illegal. - 12/03/2010 07:01:47 PM 688 Views
Re: That analogy is not apt. - 12/03/2010 02:06:51 PM 738 Views
And when the school refused to change it's policy... - 12/03/2010 03:25:03 PM 681 Views
Absurd. - 12/03/2010 08:27:19 PM 756 Views
The rules were unjust. - 13/03/2010 05:09:59 AM 795 Views
Wow, talk about proving my point! - 12/03/2010 11:04:34 PM 895 Views
So hang on. - 13/03/2010 05:04:58 AM 774 Views
It's not that I'm surprised they disagree. It's that they're Wrong. - 12/03/2010 06:39:30 AM 758 Views
It is a great case of Selective Outrage, IMHO - 12/03/2010 03:10:01 AM 806 Views
Maybe. - 12/03/2010 06:34:42 AM 803 Views
"ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 12:31:14 PM 722 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 01:53:39 PM 753 Views
Re: "ACLU Defends Nazi's Right to Burn Down ACLU Headquarters" - 12/03/2010 03:04:43 PM 710 Views
As is often the case, there seems to be a fair amount of assumption going on here. - 12/03/2010 02:22:48 PM 710 Views
Just giving the benefit of the doubt... - 12/03/2010 02:57:23 PM 772 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 07:23:54 PM 751 Views
Re: "Pursuing their ideology" - 12/03/2010 08:17:25 PM 740 Views
That wasn't the impression I was under - 12/03/2010 11:23:08 PM 628 Views
Re: That wasn't the impression I was under - 13/03/2010 12:09:08 AM 786 Views
Pshhh there's a difference between "wear SOME clothes" and "wear a tux" - 15/03/2010 01:40:37 AM 671 Views
Your comments are inconsistent - 15/03/2010 02:09:43 AM 731 Views
I think you're optimistic about what her chances would've been - 12/03/2010 07:13:38 PM 741 Views
For the record... - 12/03/2010 06:48:25 AM 729 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 01:04:33 PM 770 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 07:08:06 PM 791 Views
Re: For the record... - 12/03/2010 08:08:42 PM 760 Views
Don't you think you're sensationalizing this just a bit? - 12/03/2010 05:42:21 AM 729 Views
Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 01:46:23 PM 731 Views
Re: Actually it is that reductionist - 12/03/2010 07:25:41 PM 807 Views
I have issues with both sides, I think - 12/03/2010 02:44:06 PM 693 Views
When I was in high school, my girlfriend and I formulated a petition so we'd be able to attend - 12/03/2010 07:55:33 PM 851 Views
Another thing I think people should remember - - 12/03/2010 07:59:43 PM 848 Views
One point though - 12/03/2010 08:40:32 PM 771 Views
Re: One point though - 12/03/2010 08:46:30 PM 830 Views
My point was that it was a hollow reassurance - 12/03/2010 09:35:46 PM 663 Views
yah, but honestly, is a tux really going to upset anyone that much? - 13/03/2010 04:50:08 PM 633 Views
Just because it wouldn't bother you doesn't mean it won't bother anyone else - 13/03/2010 06:38:03 PM 698 Views
It does - 13/03/2010 07:35:39 PM 683 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 07:48:35 PM 628 Views
I typically agree with you - 13/03/2010 09:19:27 PM 735 Views
Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 13/03/2010 10:17:27 PM 676 Views
yah, but at this point, how much of it is the girl? - 13/03/2010 10:24:57 PM 642 Views
Is she a child or an adult? IIRC she's 18 - 13/03/2010 11:33:39 PM 698 Views
No, it should not - 14/03/2010 12:33:56 AM 900 Views
Re: No, it should not - 14/03/2010 01:16:33 AM 808 Views
I understood that. You explained it well. *NM* - 14/03/2010 03:28:10 AM 318 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 01:49:34 AM 736 Views
Re: Following proper form shouldn't guarantee victory - 15/03/2010 02:44:17 AM 615 Views
This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 04:27:43 AM 766 Views
Re: This is definitely true - 15/03/2010 05:18:11 AM 1012 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 08:18:03 PM 720 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 09:30:21 PM 635 Views
Re: It does - 13/03/2010 10:11:21 PM 829 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:11:11 AM 732 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 03:42:06 AM 773 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 12:47:47 AM 784 Views
Re: It does - 14/03/2010 04:09:18 AM 755 Views
You make good points. *NM* - 15/03/2010 08:08:37 PM 287 Views
Ah, yes, "the rules." - 15/03/2010 01:47:31 AM 664 Views
Read my replies to Nossy and Ghavrel - 15/03/2010 05:01:29 AM 739 Views
Slippery slope arguments are stupid. - 14/03/2010 12:43:00 AM 622 Views
So is likening everythng back to the Civil Rights Movement - 14/03/2010 04:17:54 AM 775 Views
"Dress codes exists for a reason?" - 15/03/2010 01:43:36 AM 680 Views
They do - 15/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 796 Views
Damn. Poor liberals, all revved up with nothing to fight for. *NM* - 12/03/2010 10:16:12 PM 470 Views
So... they were ready to fight something bad, and nothing bad happened - 12/03/2010 11:30:02 PM 620 Views
Teenaged lesbians - 15/03/2010 06:55:12 AM 739 Views

Reply to Message