Active Users:851 Time:14/09/2026 04:28:08 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM

View original post
Meanwhile, in typical Democrat hypocrisy, they have absolutely no qualms about having used similarly illicit information during the Nixon administration, and consider Daniel Ellsberg and Mark Felt heroes of a sort.

"Everyone's a hypocrite" isn't a great defense.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
The truly amusing thing about all this. LiterateDog - 13/07/2017 02:32:33 PM 1204 Views
that's the thing with muddying the waters damookster - 13/07/2017 03:20:24 PM 591 Views
The media lost the respect they commanded back then. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:42:27 PM 493 Views
The other thing I was thinking.... Jeordam - 13/07/2017 07:05:27 PM 666 Views
We know how they would react because it happened. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:37:43 PM 556 Views
So imprison Clinton and Trump both. Just put Kasich in. I don't mind. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:40:02 AM 581 Views
No thanks. We don't need Mr. Magoo as President. Tom - 14/07/2017 08:46:14 PM 615 Views
And why would we imprison Trump, counselor? Tom - 14/07/2017 08:47:34 PM 554 Views
This is your defense? "Other people would do it too?" *NM* Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:36:26 AM 277 Views
To quoque or not to quoque, I think the essential defense is there is NO wrongdoing in such events Cannoli - 14/07/2017 04:45:41 AM 629 Views
That's at least more logically consistent. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 10:42:08 AM 665 Views
I don't need a defense.... Jeordam - 14/07/2017 08:31:12 PM 511 Views
Actually it is illegal in several ways Roland00 - 15/07/2017 01:55:02 AM 644 Views
dirt on an opponent is equivilent to a monetary disbursment? *NM* damookster - 15/07/2017 03:43:28 AM 394 Views
I don't have an opinion on whether the law was broken here. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 05:12:08 AM 687 Views
Yes Roland00 - 15/07/2017 02:34:53 PM 566 Views
Bah damookster - 15/07/2017 04:56:08 PM 518 Views
Question Mookie, when did you think this law was enacted and last revised? Roland00 - 16/07/2017 11:46:43 AM 567 Views
No clue. I could google, of course, but that would be cheating. *NM* damookster - 16/07/2017 03:29:52 PM 320 Views
The offered dirty was that the Clintons were taking campaign donations from a foreign national again random thoughts - 18/07/2017 08:08:23 PM 551 Views
I very well could be wrong, but I don't think that I am. Jeordam - 17/07/2017 04:50:24 PM 570 Views
Well yeah. That happened. But it's not the main point. It's a side-bonus. nossy - 13/07/2017 10:22:32 PM 481 Views
I'm waiting for Little Marco to send me a subpoena. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:40:25 PM 590 Views
That's a very good point that needs further exploration damookster - 13/07/2017 11:54:56 PM 577 Views
The New York Times still has a fold? Tom - 14/07/2017 02:28:48 PM 530 Views
I think I served you a subpoena once. . . It was a small subpoena. *NM* Roland00 - 14/07/2017 09:02:48 AM 342 Views
What are your opinions on Manning and Snowden? I honestly don't remember. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:42:09 AM 533 Views
Well, the Russian government did not swear oaths as members of the US military or public servants Cannoli - 14/07/2017 04:58:18 AM 634 Views
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM 606 Views
Are you sure? aerocontrols - 14/07/2017 02:29:51 PM 462 Views
That only works if you can claim with a straight face the GOP wouldn't care Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:32:43 PM 608 Views
You've misunderstood me aerocontrols - 14/07/2017 06:22:21 PM 608 Views
I don't think I have. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 02:34:27 AM 547 Views
No I'm not. aerocontrols - 15/07/2017 03:09:04 AM 625 Views
Re: No I'm not. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 05:07:42 AM 563 Views
Re: No I'm not. aerocontrols - 17/07/2017 02:55:54 PM 637 Views
Re: No I'm not. Ghavrel - 18/07/2017 01:27:06 AM 520 Views
Yes you are. Tom - 18/07/2017 06:40:45 AM 487 Views
You made the right choice, then. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/07/2017 03:37:40 PM 323 Views
It's really the only way I can get into cool threads aerocontrols - 18/07/2017 04:03:05 PM 500 Views
The Democrats definitely won in regards to changing the conversation. The Shrike - 14/07/2017 06:06:58 PM 620 Views
Pay no attention to that CIA agent behind the voting curtain (in X country) Tom - 18/07/2017 06:43:38 AM 601 Views
When the media is the cornerstone of your political base it is easy to control the tone random thoughts - 19/07/2017 01:22:51 PM 610 Views
The other amusing thing is the GOP voters' sudden love for Russia. Legolas - 14/07/2017 06:43:12 PM 638 Views
There was a great article in the NYT about that The Shrike - 14/07/2017 08:29:29 PM 721 Views
There's nothing "sudden" about it for me. *NM* Tom - 14/07/2017 08:49:38 PM 345 Views
I know. I was going to add a comment about how you must love that. Legolas - 14/07/2017 11:08:41 PM 1200 Views
I'm considering pitching to go on Fox or something. Tom - 18/07/2017 05:41:56 AM 547 Views
Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia aerocontrols - 18/07/2017 04:10:01 PM 748 Views
Good idea. Legolas - 23/07/2017 05:50:33 PM 594 Views
You are the fly in every republican cake Roland00 - 15/07/2017 01:56:24 AM 610 Views
I really don't understand 99% of your responses Tom - 18/07/2017 06:42:09 AM 630 Views
Yes Tom, Yes Exactly *NM* Roland00 - 18/07/2017 03:46:22 PM 329 Views
It was and still just the isolationist wing of the party that feels that way random thoughts - 19/07/2017 01:27:41 PM 566 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes