Active Users:358 Time:06/07/2025 04:20:07 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM

View original post
Meanwhile, in typical Democrat hypocrisy, they have absolutely no qualms about having used similarly illicit information during the Nixon administration, and consider Daniel Ellsberg and Mark Felt heroes of a sort.

"Everyone's a hypocrite" isn't a great defense.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
The truly amusing thing about all this. LiterateDog - 13/07/2017 02:32:33 PM 1083 Views
that's the thing with muddying the waters damookster - 13/07/2017 03:20:24 PM 474 Views
The media lost the respect they commanded back then. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:42:27 PM 379 Views
The other thing I was thinking.... Jeordam - 13/07/2017 07:05:27 PM 535 Views
We know how they would react because it happened. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:37:43 PM 439 Views
So imprison Clinton and Trump both. Just put Kasich in. I don't mind. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:40:02 AM 453 Views
No thanks. We don't need Mr. Magoo as President. Tom - 14/07/2017 08:46:14 PM 499 Views
And why would we imprison Trump, counselor? Tom - 14/07/2017 08:47:34 PM 440 Views
This is your defense? "Other people would do it too?" *NM* Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:36:26 AM 219 Views
To quoque or not to quoque, I think the essential defense is there is NO wrongdoing in such events Cannoli - 14/07/2017 04:45:41 AM 498 Views
That's at least more logically consistent. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 10:42:08 AM 534 Views
I don't need a defense.... Jeordam - 14/07/2017 08:31:12 PM 392 Views
Actually it is illegal in several ways Roland00 - 15/07/2017 01:55:02 AM 531 Views
dirt on an opponent is equivilent to a monetary disbursment? *NM* damookster - 15/07/2017 03:43:28 AM 332 Views
I don't have an opinion on whether the law was broken here. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 05:12:08 AM 553 Views
Yes Roland00 - 15/07/2017 02:34:53 PM 423 Views
Bah damookster - 15/07/2017 04:56:08 PM 413 Views
Question Mookie, when did you think this law was enacted and last revised? Roland00 - 16/07/2017 11:46:43 AM 460 Views
No clue. I could google, of course, but that would be cheating. *NM* damookster - 16/07/2017 03:29:52 PM 267 Views
The offered dirty was that the Clintons were taking campaign donations from a foreign national again random thoughts - 18/07/2017 08:08:23 PM 429 Views
I very well could be wrong, but I don't think that I am. Jeordam - 17/07/2017 04:50:24 PM 450 Views
Well yeah. That happened. But it's not the main point. It's a side-bonus. nossy - 13/07/2017 10:22:32 PM 375 Views
I'm waiting for Little Marco to send me a subpoena. Tom - 13/07/2017 10:40:25 PM 464 Views
That's a very good point that needs further exploration damookster - 13/07/2017 11:54:56 PM 463 Views
The New York Times still has a fold? Tom - 14/07/2017 02:28:48 PM 426 Views
I think I served you a subpoena once. . . It was a small subpoena. *NM* Roland00 - 14/07/2017 09:02:48 AM 284 Views
What are your opinions on Manning and Snowden? I honestly don't remember. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:42:09 AM 422 Views
Well, the Russian government did not swear oaths as members of the US military or public servants Cannoli - 14/07/2017 04:58:18 AM 508 Views
Extend the query to Wikileaks publishing the documents, then. Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 10:34:53 AM 493 Views
Are you sure? aerocontrols - 14/07/2017 02:29:51 PM 350 Views
That only works if you can claim with a straight face the GOP wouldn't care Ghavrel - 14/07/2017 03:32:43 PM 489 Views
You've misunderstood me aerocontrols - 14/07/2017 06:22:21 PM 493 Views
I don't think I have. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 02:34:27 AM 427 Views
No I'm not. aerocontrols - 15/07/2017 03:09:04 AM 500 Views
Re: No I'm not. Ghavrel - 15/07/2017 05:07:42 AM 451 Views
Re: No I'm not. aerocontrols - 17/07/2017 02:55:54 PM 496 Views
Re: No I'm not. Ghavrel - 18/07/2017 01:27:06 AM 390 Views
Yes you are. Tom - 18/07/2017 06:40:45 AM 370 Views
You made the right choice, then. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/07/2017 03:37:40 PM 265 Views
It's really the only way I can get into cool threads aerocontrols - 18/07/2017 04:03:05 PM 369 Views
The Democrats definitely won in regards to changing the conversation. The Shrike - 14/07/2017 06:06:58 PM 502 Views
Pay no attention to that CIA agent behind the voting curtain (in X country) Tom - 18/07/2017 06:43:38 AM 445 Views
When the media is the cornerstone of your political base it is easy to control the tone random thoughts - 19/07/2017 01:22:51 PM 494 Views
The other amusing thing is the GOP voters' sudden love for Russia. Legolas - 14/07/2017 06:43:12 PM 517 Views
There was a great article in the NYT about that The Shrike - 14/07/2017 08:29:29 PM 563 Views
There's nothing "sudden" about it for me. *NM* Tom - 14/07/2017 08:49:38 PM 277 Views
I know. I was going to add a comment about how you must love that. Legolas - 14/07/2017 11:08:41 PM 1086 Views
I'm considering pitching to go on Fox or something. Tom - 18/07/2017 05:41:56 AM 430 Views
Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia aerocontrols - 18/07/2017 04:10:01 PM 591 Views
Good idea. Legolas - 23/07/2017 05:50:33 PM 482 Views
You are the fly in every republican cake Roland00 - 15/07/2017 01:56:24 AM 499 Views
I really don't understand 99% of your responses Tom - 18/07/2017 06:42:09 AM 525 Views
Yes Tom, Yes Exactly *NM* Roland00 - 18/07/2017 03:46:22 PM 246 Views
It was and still just the isolationist wing of the party that feels that way random thoughts - 19/07/2017 01:27:41 PM 457 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes