and I don't feel like it's my fault. I agree with BLM like 95% and I think they're (and you!) making a tactical mistake of trying to push me away (and successfully pushing away others, as evidenced by polling data) and all you want to do is argue about the 5% and mischaracterize my beliefs about the 95%.
It's fascinating how you read their positions and behaviors with such understanding and can come away from my initial post believing I hold the exact opposite stance that I actually hold. Did you miss my final paragraph? Was it confusing? Did I say they drove me to oppose even a single reform I believed in before they existed? Maybe in the abstract you think BLM and criminal justice reform are the same thing, but concretely you have to know they're not, right?
Oh I'm crying a river of tears over this.
I guess you win the drama award?
So you still don't believe me, I guess. Because this mostly just looks like you repeating the first sentence of my final paragraph back at me, and pretending that you're telling me something I don't already know or care about.
No I didn't. I needed to read it to understand why BLM takes a large role in a wide-ranging argument over a shooting in Ferguson and stuff like Eric Garner's killing is barely on the radar. It was also helpful to me to understand why you seem to be so upset with me and apparently won't stop looking for cracks in my support for something you claim to care about despite my assertions that I also care about it.
I have a view I think is correct. I didn't say I was losing support for my view. I said I can't support them, and your form of argument turns me off to you, which you say you don't care about, except you can't stop arguing over it. I still hold the same views as before.
You think I've changed or moderated my views, and what I'm saying is that my views remain unchanged, despite the objections I've expressed. I really don't know how to discuss this with you, when you so consistently misrepresent what I've written.