A few years ago we had an extensive argument on the WoTMB where you vehemently defended her and refused to acknowledge the slightest fault whatsoever in her murder of two helpless women.
Yeah, enemy combatants are innocent women. Nice try.
And this lack of training isn't outrageous and wrong because...?
They do not have to be. In the case of Tamir Rice, for instance, the call indicated the gun was probably fake, and the probability of the person being a juvenile. This info was not passed on to the officers. Exactly why you think superhuman abilities are needed to correctly transcribe a call and rely crucial information to cops is beyond me.
Egwene would have been perfectly justified, within the moral standards of her own world or our own, to blast every single Seanchan who was in that corridor. That you think a child playing in a playground is comparable to an invading army intent on killing or enslaving just reveals your deep racism and moral corruption.
That's ludicrous. There are entire TV shows, not to mention buddy cop movies, where they're anything but. Maybe you watch an alt-universe version of American cinema and TV? Certainly not out of the realm of possibility.
Wait a minute... for America to be proud of its cops, no single cop can ever be shown as antagonistic in a single movie or show? Most of us have saner standards, Cannoli.
And look at all the magnificent reforms that have followed... err no.
And I'm not saying American pride in cops, or its soldiers, isn't hypocritical. As is often the case in this country, these sentiments are trotted out when it is politically convenient, not out of some principled adherence to a viewpoint.
Oh yeah. Kneeling during the anthem is kneeling against the police. It just cannot be a statement about how the system preys on and betrays the weakest of its citizenry. Oh no.
Also, for someone who seems so furious at this disrespect to the flag, I notice that far from being outraged, you were defending the rights of Confederate Flag wielding racists in Charlottesville. Why is that political speech worth protecting, but not this one? Because you agree with one and not the other?
Oh yes. Not indicting a guy who lied about his evaluation as emotionally unstable and unfit for duty in his previous police job, who then shot a kid with a toy gun... what is that if not a blind deference to police authority?