Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh would be the timeline in the entire thing. I don't remember Anita Hill saying that she was 15 years old at the time, and Clarence Thomas was 17. Time is a valid factor...
~Jeordam
Why does his being 17 make a difference? If the allegations are true, he lied now and claimed he absolutely did not do it. If he had said he may have done it, was deeply sorry, and asked that his acts as a 17 year old not be used against him, that would be one thing. But that isn't what happened.
And with the Deborah Ramirez case, he'd have been 18. I'm really not sure what age has to do with anything here.