That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen.
The Count Send a noteboard - 23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM
The way you said it was perfect.
RJ's writing violates some of the ideas that critics have of what makes a proper book, but my personal opinion is that many of those supposed "faults" are important factors in creating a fantasy world that feels more real and complete to me than anything else I've ever read.
Other fantasy worlds in books I've read are often interesting, but they feel small and undeveloped, and I can't help but feel like their entires worlds only have a population of about 200 people. With the Wheel of Time, I get the idea of a real world, with various populated nations with fully developed cultures that I can relate to. In my mind, Robert Jordan will is superior to all other fantasy writers I've read in that regard. Other writers are superior to RJ in other ways, but I will never consider RJ to be a bad writer because of that--though he is lacking is some areas.
RJ's writing violates some of the ideas that critics have of what makes a proper book, but my personal opinion is that many of those supposed "faults" are important factors in creating a fantasy world that feels more real and complete to me than anything else I've ever read.
Other fantasy worlds in books I've read are often interesting, but they feel small and undeveloped, and I can't help but feel like their entires worlds only have a population of about 200 people. With the Wheel of Time, I get the idea of a real world, with various populated nations with fully developed cultures that I can relate to. In my mind, Robert Jordan will is superior to all other fantasy writers I've read in that regard. Other writers are superior to RJ in other ways, but I will never consider RJ to be a bad writer because of that--though he is lacking is some areas.
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM
- 3116 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer.
21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM
- 1500 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured
22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM
- 1154 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM
- 1015 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM
- 1115 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM
- 1489 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. *NM*
22/02/2011 02:39:20 PM
- 834 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
22/02/2011 02:41:37 PM
- 957 Views
That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen.
23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM
- 1072 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM
- 1518 Views
Re: I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM
- 1174 Views
That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a channeler.
22/02/2011 11:30:52 PM
- 1083 Views
Re: That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a
23/02/2011 12:02:24 AM
- 1130 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ...
22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM
- 1059 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM
- 1931 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited.
22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM
- 1429 Views
That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
23/02/2011 02:15:12 AM
- 1185 Views
Re: That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
23/02/2011 11:02:14 AM
- 1156 Views
adam roberts reviews
23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM
- 1150 Views
And I suspect those who prefer the BS books are those who largely read WoT for the story. *NM*
23/02/2011 08:06:16 AM
- 687 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking
24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM
- 1004 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM
- 1300 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM
- 1241 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know. *NM*
22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM
- 633 Views
There are nine, actually...
23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM
- 1296 Views
Lovecraft's Necronomicon was fictitious. If you want to count fanfiction, fine. *NM*
23/02/2011 12:38:07 AM
- 705 Views
Based on how poorly worded that response was, I'm not sure what to think of it. *NM*
23/02/2011 12:13:00 AM
- 684 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you.
23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM
- 997 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you.
24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM
- 1147 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM
- 1075 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM
- 931 Views
So wait, style is good?
25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM
- 1338 Views
That depends...
23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM
- 1207 Views
I didn't say aesthetics was the primary criterion. I named three criteria.
23/02/2011 05:39:03 AM
- 1093 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion
23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM
- 1082 Views
If you don't mind me asking...
24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM
- 911 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM
- 902 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM
- 1069 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM
- 1133 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM
- 1030 Views
...
25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM
- 966 Views
It is not a serious question.
25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM
- 977 Views
Is that so?
25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM
- 1044 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan.
25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM
- 1054 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him?
25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM
- 1102 Views
You're conflating two things.
25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM
- 1082 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere.
26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM
- 984 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity.
26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM
- 838 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM*
26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM
- 655 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered.
25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM
- 997 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM
- 1145 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM
- 1546 Views
I'm not wasting my time proving something to an internet moron and troll like you.
25/02/2011 07:36:19 PM
- 921 Views
Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic"
28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM
- 930 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
26/02/2011 11:06:26 AM
- 964 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly
23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM
- 1130 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM
- 966 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM
- 1128 Views
Of course people read for pleasure.
23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM
- 928 Views
Ok...
24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM
- 967 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument.
24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM
- 1041 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"?
24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM
- 1052 Views
Among living writers?
24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM
- 1087 Views
My list would be similar...
26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM
- 1196 Views
That was a very good list.
26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM
- 1018 Views
Re: That was a very good list.
27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM
- 1077 Views
Oh, and another question
27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM
- 862 Views
Re: Oh, and another question
01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM
- 1036 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM
- 1136 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM
- 1171 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM
- 1063 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM
- 1012 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM*
27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM
- 723 Views