Active Users:600 Time:16/06/2026 11:41:34 AM
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM
That absurd rant almost puts you on par with "Lo'oris" for stupidity.

You first say that everything is subjective, then you say that a cross in urine is objectively not art. That position is exactly how people defend modern art - everything is subjective. Pick a position and stick with it.

You are fully within your rights to say that everyone has their own tastes as to what they like and don't like. I don't think anyone here at any point was trying to say that people don't have a right to like Robert Jordan or anyone else for that matter.

However, your reductionist argument is useless. By that standard, someone who writes a book where every sentence looks like "The ddog jumt and itwer happi with sanwichus becuz she think God wil b 2 happi and SAILBOAT!" is "well written". If there is no way of using consensus to agree on criteria by which something can be judged for value than nothing has any meaning at all. Why learn anything at all?

I find it amazing how violently stupid so many of you are here at the WoT board. It's like I wandered into a trailer park or something.


If 10 million people like your book "The ddog jumt and itwer happi with sanwichus becuz she think God wil b 2 happi and SAILBOAT!" well...

The concept of "everything is relative" is far from stupid; your inane example however may well qualify. “Everything is relative” is a concept championed by many of your beloved "good" writers in their "classics".

If you are going to declare "..how violently stupid so many of you are here at the WoT board..." please post your MENSA invitation or IQ score; I will happily post mine. Until then I am quite sure you are capable of guessing which bodily orifice you can insert your snobbery into.

You were the one that placed the introduction of Lolita a an example of "good" prose. You were the one who has refused to explain why it was good. You are the one who refuses to admit that your definition of "good" is completely subjective and in no way more definitive than that of anyone else. You are teh one who retreats behind insults when you are questioned. You are the one who has questioned (insulted would be more accurate) the intelligence of everyone else on this board who dares to disagree with you.

I asked in a quick poll recently who people though could be Rand reborn in our age, I think we now know who Joseph McCarthy was reborn as.
Reply to message
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? - 21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM 3552 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer. - 21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM 1980 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured - 22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM 1650 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? - 23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM 1482 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? - 23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM 1555 Views
Oh, it really depends. - 23/02/2011 05:39:07 PM 1347 Views
thanks, I'll have a look *NM* - 23/02/2011 05:40:50 PM 1022 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. - 21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM 1970 Views
Thank you. - 21/02/2011 11:43:08 PM 1672 Views
Well Said! - 22/02/2011 02:42:22 PM 1748 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to. - 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM 2052 Views
Do you enjoy reading Robert Jordan's ... - 22/02/2011 04:31:28 PM 1757 Views
Not particularly. - 22/02/2011 10:22:00 PM 1908 Views
Agreed. - 22/02/2011 10:37:08 PM 1510 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ... - 22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM 1592 Views
Amen *NM* - 22/02/2011 04:32:50 PM 938 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? - 22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM 2605 Views
Brain overload! This is really well thought out. - 23/02/2011 10:22:37 PM 1691 Views
thank you for the insight into the outside view lol - 24/02/2011 04:34:57 PM 1620 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. - 22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM 1984 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. - 22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM 1834 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know. *NM* - 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM 926 Views
There are nine, actually... - 23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM 1779 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you. - 23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM 1424 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you. - 24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM 1578 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book - 24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM 1525 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book - 24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM 1567 Views
So wait, style is good? - 25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM 1808 Views
Re: So wait, style is good? - 25/02/2011 08:53:55 AM 1408 Views
I'm not trolling - 25/02/2011 11:57:18 PM 1438 Views
That depends... - 23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM 1709 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion - 23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM 1544 Views
Re: the "do you like it" is the most important criterion - 24/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1516 Views
Thumbs up - IMHO, all discussion can end here - 28/02/2011 05:45:34 PM 1649 Views
Not for quality of writing. - 24/02/2011 05:17:52 PM 1518 Views
Those who can do, the rest are critics. *NM* - 24/02/2011 07:55:50 PM 1003 Views
I object, sir! People don't read WoT for the way it's told? - 24/02/2011 12:58:58 AM 1584 Views
If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM 1526 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 02:19:17 AM 1453 Views
I still don't get it. - 24/02/2011 08:27:50 AM 1452 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 11:29:14 PM 1494 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. - 24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM 1458 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. - 24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM 1502 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. - 25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM 1569 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. - 25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM 1515 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:48:43 PM 948 Views
... - 25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM 1413 Views
Maybe you should have used better prose? - 25/02/2011 01:23:17 AM 1305 Views
It is not a serious question. - 25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1601 Views
How so? - 25/02/2011 02:59:05 AM 1628 Views
I have every right to use that tone. - 25/02/2011 03:08:14 PM 1482 Views
Is that so? - 25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM 1767 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan. - 25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM 1522 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him? - 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM 1554 Views
You're conflating two things. - 25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM 1707 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere. - 26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM 1559 Views
you raise very good questions... *NM* - 26/02/2011 09:21:13 AM 934 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity. - 26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM 1379 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM* - 26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM 875 Views
Glad to hear that. - 27/02/2011 03:42:33 AM 1457 Views
No problem, these things happen on the internet. *NM* - 27/02/2011 04:36:57 AM 908 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered. - 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM 1612 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. - 25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM 1697 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. - 25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM 1991 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:51:48 PM 851 Views
double post. oh my! *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:52:17 PM 875 Views
Just makes you right twice *NM* - 28/02/2011 09:42:19 PM 999 Views
Re: ... - 25/02/2011 08:59:37 AM 1475 Views
And part 2, on the analysis of writing. - 24/02/2011 01:16:20 AM 1587 Views
Florid desciption is usually not a good thing. - 24/02/2011 05:30:30 PM 1439 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly - 23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM 1772 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? - 23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM 1414 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? - 23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM 1582 Views
Of course people read for pleasure. - 23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM 1465 Views
Ok... - 24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM 1465 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument. - 24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM 1586 Views
*NM* - 24/02/2011 05:37:02 PM 924 Views
I find your above average tastes and intelligence uninspiring. - 24/02/2011 08:42:03 PM 1354 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"? - 24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM 1578 Views
Among living writers? - 24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM 1648 Views
No Rushdie? - 24/02/2011 09:22:46 PM 1417 Views
I was considering mentioning Rushdie. - 24/02/2011 09:32:20 PM 1403 Views
My list would be similar... - 26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM 1740 Views
That was a very good list. - 26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM 1675 Views
Re: That was a very good list. - 27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM 1643 Views
Once I finish Hugo I'm probably going to read Druon. - 27/02/2011 02:30:03 PM 1541 Views
Oh, and another question - 27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM 1286 Views
Re: Oh, and another question - 01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM 1592 Views
One final question, if you'll indulge me... - 01/03/2011 06:43:23 PM 1361 Views
Well, until I have time to return to your previous post but... - 01/03/2011 07:45:13 PM 1662 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM 1738 Views
You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? - 27/02/2011 02:43:46 PM 1574 Views
Re: You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? - 02/03/2011 11:47:19 PM 1712 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM 1650 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM 1625 Views
Link to DomA Post from up above: - 03/03/2011 12:20:11 AM 1764 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM* - 27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM 1016 Views

Reply to Message