Active Users:308 Time:17/05/2024 01:27:29 PM
adam roberts reviews uglycat Send a noteboard - 23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM
the robert adams reviews are interesting. clearly, he hated the story in general, which lead him to skim over a lot of the detail, which in turn made him misunderstand important things (or miss them completely).
this made the reviews kind of silly because at this point, he's not really reviewing, just slagging.

still, one thing did resonate truly for me in his review of winter's heart and it's something that's been my major beef with the books in general.

The aim, in other words, is precisely the necrophilic jouissance of postponement, an endless deferral, a tantric-sex approach to narrative satisfaction.


it's like watching the highway chase scene in matrix2, where the two trucks drive toward each other with morpheus and the key guy on top. except instead of seeing them hit and being treated to a neato CG slow motion explosion and neo swooping in to save the day, the trucks just keep driving past each other, turning around, and coming back again, only to pass by once more.

it's probably why most people hate perrin. it's not that perrin sucks, but that his story was stuck in limbo for so long, seeming to be coming close to a resolution, only to spiral away from the inevitable collision at the last second.

i've seen many people say they liked tGS and ToM more than RJ's own books and i shake my head.
but then i remember that i enjoyed sanderson's additions more too. that's in spite of him completely botching up the pacing and generally writing with a sledgehammer.
it's not at all that sanderson is good, it's that he got to write the book(s) where all the best stuff happens.

mmm, so looking back on this post, i seem to have strayed off topic. but in general, i'm mostly just underlining the fact that enjoying the story != enjoying the writing. or something. ¬_¬
Reply to message
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? - 21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM 3120 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer. - 21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM 1503 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured - 22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM 1156 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? - 23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM 1015 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? - 23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM 1115 Views
Oh, it really depends. - 23/02/2011 05:39:07 PM 878 Views
thanks, I'll have a look *NM* - 23/02/2011 05:40:50 PM 732 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. - 21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM 1493 Views
Thank you. - 21/02/2011 11:43:08 PM 1227 Views
Well Said! - 22/02/2011 02:42:22 PM 1151 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to. - 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM 1519 Views
Do you enjoy reading Robert Jordan's ... - 22/02/2011 04:31:28 PM 1183 Views
Not particularly. - 22/02/2011 10:22:00 PM 1306 Views
Agreed. - 22/02/2011 10:37:08 PM 1078 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ... - 22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM 1060 Views
Amen *NM* - 22/02/2011 04:32:50 PM 719 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? - 22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM 1931 Views
Brain overload! This is really well thought out. - 23/02/2011 10:22:37 PM 1123 Views
thank you for the insight into the outside view lol - 24/02/2011 04:34:57 PM 1183 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited. - 22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM 1431 Views
adam roberts reviews - 23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM 1155 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking - 24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM 1006 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. - 22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM 1302 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. - 22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM 1244 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know. *NM* - 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM 635 Views
There are nine, actually... - 23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM 1299 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you. - 23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM 1000 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you. - 24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM 1147 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book - 24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM 1076 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book - 24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM 934 Views
So wait, style is good? - 25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM 1339 Views
Re: So wait, style is good? - 25/02/2011 08:53:55 AM 970 Views
I'm not trolling - 25/02/2011 11:57:18 PM 1016 Views
That depends... - 23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM 1210 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion - 23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM 1084 Views
Re: the "do you like it" is the most important criterion - 24/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1078 Views
Thumbs up - IMHO, all discussion can end here - 28/02/2011 05:45:34 PM 1225 Views
Not for quality of writing. - 24/02/2011 05:17:52 PM 1011 Views
Those who can do, the rest are critics. *NM* - 24/02/2011 07:55:50 PM 699 Views
I object, sir! People don't read WoT for the way it's told? - 24/02/2011 12:58:58 AM 1118 Views
If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM 915 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 02:19:17 AM 1026 Views
I still don't get it. - 24/02/2011 08:27:50 AM 916 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 11:29:14 PM 972 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. - 24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM 904 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. - 24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM 1069 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. - 25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM 1134 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. - 25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM 1034 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:48:43 PM 731 Views
... - 25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM 968 Views
Maybe you should have used better prose? - 25/02/2011 01:23:17 AM 832 Views
It is not a serious question. - 25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 979 Views
How so? - 25/02/2011 02:59:05 AM 1097 Views
I have every right to use that tone. - 25/02/2011 03:08:14 PM 1053 Views
Is that so? - 25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM 1047 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan. - 25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM 1056 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him? - 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM 1104 Views
You're conflating two things. - 25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM 1085 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere. - 26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM 987 Views
you raise very good questions... *NM* - 26/02/2011 09:21:13 AM 640 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity. - 26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM 841 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM* - 26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM 656 Views
Glad to hear that. - 27/02/2011 03:42:33 AM 923 Views
No problem, these things happen on the internet. *NM* - 27/02/2011 04:36:57 AM 716 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered. - 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM 1000 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. - 25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM 1149 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:51:48 PM 567 Views
double post. oh my! *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:52:17 PM 606 Views
Just makes you right twice *NM* - 28/02/2011 09:42:19 PM 697 Views
Re: ... - 25/02/2011 08:59:37 AM 1028 Views
And part 2, on the analysis of writing. - 24/02/2011 01:16:20 AM 1051 Views
Florid desciption is usually not a good thing. - 24/02/2011 05:30:30 PM 995 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly - 23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM 1132 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? - 23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM 967 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? - 23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM 1130 Views
Of course people read for pleasure. - 23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM 930 Views
Ok... - 24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM 968 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument. - 24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM 1042 Views
*NM* - 24/02/2011 05:37:02 PM 597 Views
I find your above average tastes and intelligence uninspiring. - 24/02/2011 08:42:03 PM 905 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"? - 24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM 1054 Views
Among living writers? - 24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM 1091 Views
No Rushdie? - 24/02/2011 09:22:46 PM 979 Views
I was considering mentioning Rushdie. - 24/02/2011 09:32:20 PM 935 Views
My list would be similar... - 26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM 1199 Views
That was a very good list. - 26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM 1021 Views
Re: That was a very good list. - 27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM 1078 Views
Once I finish Hugo I'm probably going to read Druon. - 27/02/2011 02:30:03 PM 870 Views
Oh, and another question - 27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM 866 Views
Re: Oh, and another question - 01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM 1037 Views
One final question, if you'll indulge me... - 01/03/2011 06:43:23 PM 929 Views
Well, until I have time to return to your previous post but... - 01/03/2011 07:45:13 PM 1063 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM 1139 Views
You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? - 27/02/2011 02:43:46 PM 1050 Views
Re: You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? - 02/03/2011 11:47:19 PM 1124 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM 1172 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM 1067 Views
Link to DomA Post from up above: - 03/03/2011 12:20:11 AM 1290 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM* - 27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM 724 Views

Reply to Message