Active Users:299 Time:17/05/2024 09:32:03 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' DomA Send a noteboard - 03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM
I can see what you're getting at, but it's a distinction that I don't accept. Although I agree there are many popular books that all one asks from is enjoyment (e.g. Dan Brown, JK Rowling, John Buchan, LM Montgomery), I don't agree that being popular renders a book/author ineligble for the classification of 'great' either.


You haven't read my post attentively then, as I've mentionned how Hugo is a great popular writer (ie: he wrote great stories) and is also widely recognized as a great writer (his prose, his works have recognized artistic value).

I make the distinction (and it's a traditional disctinction, by the way - not my own) between great popular writers and great writers because if you try to judge their works with the same criterias, most of the great popular writers will end up at the bottom of the list because of the lack of artistic/aesthethic value of their writing, unless you narrow your analysis to specific craft aspects, like storytelling, characters etc. - which is a lot about purely subjective notions, such as how fun the story is, or how much you like the characters.

You can compare the craftsmanship of J.K. Rowling and Jane Austen in storytelling, but if you try to compare their Art of writing, this is not even close to a contest (which is why I find stupid to look at most popular work with the "great writing" critical grid. As far as I know, Rowling has no artistic intent with her prose - it's pointless to look at her work from this angle (as one would for a "great writer" or an author with artistic ambitions, only to arrive at the foregone conclusion that her prose has little artistic value and use that to bash her gratuitously.


Are great popular writers like Rowling, Doyle, Dumas etc. as valuable and significant culturally as the great writers is not a debate I even got into and that I leave to others like you who try to put all writing in the same bag as I don't personally care - I enjoy reading both good popular literature - great stories - and the great writers, sometimes for the same reasons (a lot of great writers were also great storytellers...), more often for fairly different reasons and I can admire craftsmanship and art in literature both (I just can see the difference between the two). I merely touched on the artistic differences that exist between popular literature and great literature. I also don't equate the vague category of "the classics" with great literature. Tons of books that became classics are recognized as such for their ideas rather than their form.
Reply to message
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? newyorkersedai - 21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM 3120 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer. darius_sedai - 21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM 1503 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured Lo'oris - 22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM 1156 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM 1015 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM 1115 Views
Oh, it really depends. Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 05:39:07 PM 878 Views
thanks, I'll have a look *NM* Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 05:40:50 PM 732 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. RabidWombat - 21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM 1493 Views
Thank you. Nargs - 21/02/2011 11:43:08 PM 1228 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. *NM* Gerbeaud - 22/02/2011 02:39:20 PM 836 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. Gerbeaud - 22/02/2011 02:41:37 PM 959 Views
Well Said! Evil_Monkey - 22/02/2011 02:42:22 PM 1151 Views
That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen. The Count - 23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM 1074 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to. Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM 1519 Views
Do you enjoy reading Robert Jordan's ... Nargs - 22/02/2011 04:31:28 PM 1183 Views
Not particularly. Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 10:22:00 PM 1306 Views
Agreed. Tom - 22/02/2011 10:37:08 PM 1078 Views
Re: I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to. Lo'oris - 22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM 1177 Views
That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a channeler. Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 11:30:52 PM 1084 Views
Re: That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 12:02:24 AM 1130 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ... Velveti - 22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM 1060 Views
Amen *NM* Nargs - 22/02/2011 04:32:50 PM 719 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? DomA - 22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM 1931 Views
Brain overload! This is really well thought out. RabidWombat - 23/02/2011 10:22:37 PM 1123 Views
thank you for the insight into the outside view lol Onarishma - 24/02/2011 04:34:57 PM 1183 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM 1431 Views
That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks newyorkersedai - 23/02/2011 02:15:12 AM 1185 Views
Re: That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 11:02:14 AM 1160 Views
adam roberts reviews uglycat - 23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM 1155 Views
And I suspect those who prefer the BS books are those who largely read WoT for the story. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 08:06:16 AM 687 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking HyogaRott - 24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM 1006 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. Tom - 22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM 1302 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. Lo'oris - 22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM 1244 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM 636 Views
There are nine, actually... Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM 1299 Views
Lovecraft's Necronomicon was fictitious. If you want to count fanfiction, fine. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 12:38:07 AM 707 Views
Based on how poorly worded that response was, I'm not sure what to think of it. *NM* Tom - 23/02/2011 12:13:00 AM 685 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you. Stephen - 23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM 1000 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you. Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM 1147 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book Stephen - 24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM 1077 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM 934 Views
So wait, style is good? Stephen - 25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM 1339 Views
Re: So wait, style is good? Lo'oris - 25/02/2011 08:53:55 AM 970 Views
I'm not trolling Stephen - 25/02/2011 11:57:18 PM 1016 Views
That depends... DomA - 23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM 1210 Views
I didn't say aesthetics was the primary criterion. I named three criteria. Tom - 23/02/2011 05:39:03 AM 1097 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion RabidWombat - 23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM 1085 Views
Re: the "do you like it" is the most important criterion DomA - 24/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1078 Views
Thumbs up - IMHO, all discussion can end here Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:45:34 PM 1225 Views
Not for quality of writing. Tom - 24/02/2011 05:17:52 PM 1011 Views
Those who can do, the rest are critics. *NM* HyogaRott - 24/02/2011 07:55:50 PM 699 Views
I object, sir! People don't read WoT for the way it's told? newyorkersedai - 24/02/2011 12:58:58 AM 1118 Views
If you don't mind me asking... Fanatic-Templar - 24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM 915 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... DomA - 24/02/2011 02:19:17 AM 1026 Views
I still don't get it. Fanatic-Templar - 24/02/2011 08:27:50 AM 916 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:29:14 PM 972 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. Tom - 24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM 904 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM 1069 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. Tom - 25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM 1134 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. Lo'oris - 25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM 1034 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:48:43 PM 731 Views
... Fanatic-Templar - 25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM 968 Views
Maybe you should have used better prose? fionwe1987 - 25/02/2011 01:23:17 AM 832 Views
It is not a serious question. Tom - 25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 979 Views
How so? fionwe1987 - 25/02/2011 02:59:05 AM 1097 Views
I have every right to use that tone. Tom - 25/02/2011 03:08:14 PM 1054 Views
Is that so? Fanatic-Templar - 25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM 1047 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan. Tom - 25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM 1057 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him? Fanatic-Templar - 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM 1104 Views
You're conflating two things. Tom - 25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM 1085 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere. Fanatic-Templar - 26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM 987 Views
you raise very good questions... *NM* Nargs - 26/02/2011 09:21:13 AM 640 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity. Tom - 26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM 841 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM 656 Views
Glad to hear that. Tom - 27/02/2011 03:42:33 AM 923 Views
No problem, these things happen on the internet. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 27/02/2011 04:36:57 AM 716 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered. HyogaRott - 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM 1001 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. Tom - 25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM 1149 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. HyogaRott - 25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM 1550 Views
I'm not wasting my time proving something to an internet moron and troll like you. Tom - 25/02/2011 07:36:19 PM 925 Views
Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic" HyogaRott - 28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM 931 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. Lo'oris - 26/02/2011 11:06:26 AM 968 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:51:48 PM 567 Views
double post. oh my! *NM* Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:52:17 PM 606 Views
Just makes you right twice *NM* HyogaRott - 28/02/2011 09:42:19 PM 697 Views
Re: ... Lo'oris - 25/02/2011 08:59:37 AM 1028 Views
And part 2, on the analysis of writing. newyorkersedai - 24/02/2011 01:16:20 AM 1051 Views
Florid desciption is usually not a good thing. Tom - 24/02/2011 05:30:30 PM 995 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly GarethBryne - 23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM 1133 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM 967 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? GarethBryne - 23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM 1132 Views
Of course people read for pleasure. Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM 930 Views
Ok... Nargs - 24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM 968 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument. Ghavrel - 24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM 1042 Views
*NM* Tom - 24/02/2011 05:37:02 PM 597 Views
I find your above average tastes and intelligence uninspiring. Nargs - 24/02/2011 08:42:03 PM 906 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"? VTHokie - 24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM 1055 Views
Among living writers? Tom - 24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM 1092 Views
No Rushdie? fionwe1987 - 24/02/2011 09:22:46 PM 979 Views
I was considering mentioning Rushdie. Tom - 24/02/2011 09:32:20 PM 935 Views
My list would be similar... DomA - 26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM 1199 Views
That was a very good list. Tom - 26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM 1021 Views
Re: That was a very good list. DomA - 27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM 1078 Views
Once I finish Hugo I'm probably going to read Druon. Tom - 27/02/2011 02:30:03 PM 870 Views
Oh, and another question Tom - 27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM 866 Views
Re: Oh, and another question DomA - 01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM 1038 Views
One final question, if you'll indulge me... Tom - 01/03/2011 06:43:23 PM 929 Views
Well, until I have time to return to your previous post but... DomA - 01/03/2011 07:45:13 PM 1063 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' Iain83 - 27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM 1139 Views
You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? Tom - 27/02/2011 02:43:46 PM 1050 Views
Re: You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? Iain83 - 02/03/2011 11:47:19 PM 1124 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' DomA - 28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM 1172 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' Iain83 - 03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM 1067 Views
Link to DomA Post from up above: Nargs - 03/03/2011 12:20:11 AM 1290 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' DomA - 03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM 1014 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM* Marshall - 27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM 724 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes