Who would you make them for anyway? It's not like the Generals get personally involved in the fighting and there is no way to mass produce the things for the common soldiers or even the lower level officers.
The cloaks are cool and all, but take the best swordsmen in the world, receiving the physical gifts of the bond, and encase them in unbreakable, lightweight armor, and you have a force capable of going through most armies, even channeling ones.
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
- 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
1696 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
1168 Views
I suppose I am on a...
- 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
1089 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
1195 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
1236 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
- 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
1297 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
- 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
1169 Views
Ummm, Warders...
- 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
1020 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
- 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
1076 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
965 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1124 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
945 Views
which way is it?
- 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
951 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
- 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
1067 Views
That's really not my point.
- 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
958 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
- 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
1036 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
- 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
1011 Views
Not nesecarrily
- 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
996 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
- 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
1101 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
- 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
977 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
- 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
932 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
987 Views
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
987 Views
Not accurate
- 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
1062 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
- 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
1035 Views
I disagree
- 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
998 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
- 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
925 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
- 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
1062 Views
nope
- 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
939 Views
*Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
1093 Views
Re: *Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
1262 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
1045 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
961 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
943 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
919 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
1115 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
- 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
961 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
- 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
1114 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
- 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
979 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
- 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
935 Views
