Active Users:670 Time:18/12/2025 04:23:11 PM
which way is it? LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
You can't insist that an idea is possible despite what's going on/limitations in the books and then say it would be superior because of those limitations.

If we're going to work with the assumption that it's suddenly possible for the AS to experiment with and manufacture heartstone armor in the tiny amount of time remaining before The Last Battle, then I'm going to work with the assumption that Aes Sedai that can suddenly accomplish this task can be countered with channelers of similar skill/intelligence.

Additionally, there are a great number of channelers in the Last Battle that aren't going to be Aes Sedai. And some, like the Seanchan, are going to have great tactical minds behind them. It's not like the channelers themselves have to think of the concepts anyway
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1646 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1109 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 578 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1033 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1109 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 532 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1005 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1176 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 968 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 575 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 983 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1136 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 492 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1236 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1031 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1002 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1009 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1023 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1100 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 950 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1012 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 919 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1048 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 885 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 898 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1002 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 889 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 860 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 637 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 982 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 946 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 932 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1046 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 905 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 874 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 998 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 980 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 935 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 851 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 995 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 869 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1035 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1202 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 886 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 859 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1039 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 895 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 897 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1051 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 906 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 876 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 987 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 556 Views

Reply to Message