Active Users:342 Time:17/06/2025 04:54:58 PM
My point is HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM
That increased survivability is increased survivability. Your argument, taken to the extreme would result in everyone in a battle to just say "whatever" and stab themselves because nothing could protect them from every potential death so they might as well just get it over with.

Sorry, most people's attitudes don't work that way, and I suspect neither do yours. In a conflict situation I am going to take every resonable advantage I can lay my hands on "..to make the other dumb son of a bitch die for his." as Patton supposedly said. C armor is just one more (relatively) simple way to help make that happen.

I hope some sort of C armor makes an appearance in the final story even if it is just Egwene changing Gawyn's shield on the eve of battle with the customary "Oh, I should have thought of this earlier." that we have seen other times.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1506 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 973 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 509 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 897 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 998 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 468 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 871 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1061 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 852 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 505 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 840 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 989 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 436 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1098 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 904 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 878 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 876 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 909 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 958 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 799 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 891 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 762 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 900 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 747 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 769 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 876 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 756 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 746 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 583 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 865 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 807 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 812 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 926 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 759 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 771 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 876 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 843 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 810 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 715 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 821 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 740 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 868 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1031 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 753 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 739 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 894 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 770 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 773 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 943 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 779 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 759 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 811 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 474 Views

Reply to Message