Active Users:590 Time:02/08/2025 05:47:24 PM
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
Only a handful benefit from them and more power to them if they choose to use armor, but given the lack of more than a slightly better set of armor the energy IMO would be better spent elsewhere.

Realistically cuendillar armor won't give much advantage over regular steel unless weapons are also being made of cuendillar (also a better use of resource IMO). Cuendillar armor won't keep you alive from an OP attack, won't help you against a canon shot and won't prevent a better warrior from chopping your head off. It's not like it's some "magic" armor ... It's just made from a superior material, advantage yes, but is it going to make a world of difference on a mass scale ... Very doubtful. Armor is armor.

If they are going to mass produce things from cuendillar there are more effective ways to put the resource to use. With canons in place city walls are far more vulnerable than in the past. With cuendillar walls canons are useless in a siege ... Not that Traveling doesn't make walls irrelevant, but then using cuendillar for any of these purposes seems silly since it's also impossible to adapt something once it's made.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1528 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 995 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 519 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 915 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1015 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 479 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 890 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1081 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 871 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 520 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 866 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1013 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 445 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1120 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 920 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 900 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 895 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 925 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 973 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 821 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 908 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 793 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 921 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 766 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 789 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 897 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 774 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 764 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 594 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 882 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 832 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 830 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 944 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 777 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 789 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 893 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 872 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 842 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 735 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 851 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 760 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 892 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1050 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 771 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 763 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 928 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 788 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 793 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 961 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 797 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 779 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 827 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 490 Views

Reply to Message