Active Users:761 Time:18/12/2025 06:04:42 PM
nope HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
Have you ever actually swung a sowrd at someone or had one swung at you? From your statements, I'd hazard a guess that the answer is "no"

Any SCA folks on the boards want to weigh in on the value of armor, cause folks just aint beleiving me when I say that knowing you are not going to get cut up like a meatloaf matters. Light-weight (less material needed) yet resiliant (C is unbreakable) IS the holy grail of armoring. Always has been, always will be and the improvement of C over steel/iron is anything but marginal.


Look elsewhere for my opinion of C weapons, in a nutshell, they have no benefit unless you have modern computer controlled manufacuting techniques (able to make micrometer fine edges), and even then the benifit is slight because you need some mass behind the weapon.

Not sure of your impracticls criteria. I have discussed manufacturing elsewhere, and it is very simple, even full plate becomes much easier because the much thinner sheets allows shaping around forms to bechilds play, especially since you do not have to worry about temper.

Summation: It is easier to make armor plates that are intended to be transformed, and the final product would be much more effective. In my book that makes it a "no-brainer"
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1646 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1109 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 578 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1033 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1110 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 532 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1005 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1178 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 968 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 575 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 984 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1138 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 492 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1236 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1031 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1002 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1009 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1023 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1102 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 950 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1014 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 919 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1048 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 885 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 899 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1002 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 889 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 860 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 637 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 982 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 946 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 932 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1046 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 905 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 874 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 998 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 980 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 935 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 851 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 995 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 871 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1036 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1202 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 886 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 859 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1039 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 897 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 897 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1051 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 906 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 876 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 987 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 556 Views

Reply to Message