Active Users:203 Time:18/05/2024 10:11:08 AM
nope HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
Have you ever actually swung a sowrd at someone or had one swung at you? From your statements, I'd hazard a guess that the answer is "no"

Any SCA folks on the boards want to weigh in on the value of armor, cause folks just aint beleiving me when I say that knowing you are not going to get cut up like a meatloaf matters. Light-weight (less material needed) yet resiliant (C is unbreakable) IS the holy grail of armoring. Always has been, always will be and the improvement of C over steel/iron is anything but marginal.


Look elsewhere for my opinion of C weapons, in a nutshell, they have no benefit unless you have modern computer controlled manufacuting techniques (able to make micrometer fine edges), and even then the benifit is slight because you need some mass behind the weapon.

Not sure of your impracticls criteria. I have discussed manufacturing elsewhere, and it is very simple, even full plate becomes much easier because the much thinner sheets allows shaping around forms to bechilds play, especially since you do not have to worry about temper.

Summation: It is easier to make armor plates that are intended to be transformed, and the final product would be much more effective. In my book that makes it a "no-brainer"
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1331 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 780 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 417 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 685 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 768 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 374 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 667 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 881 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 671 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 419 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 663 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 763 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 351 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 845 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 716 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 686 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 689 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 732 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 783 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 624 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 666 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 591 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 732 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 571 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 583 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 674 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 578 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 573 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 496 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 663 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 612 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 631 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 729 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 580 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 592 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 667 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 670 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 631 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 536 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 672 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 542 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 671 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 848 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 578 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 538 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 688 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 582 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 584 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 740 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 582 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 553 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 620 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 392 Views

Reply to Message