Active Users:731 Time:18/12/2025 05:38:10 AM
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
I'm not exactly thinking hard about these things. They all seem pretty logical and simple to me. Pulling the earth out from under a group of soldiers already sounds like a fantastic idea to me.


Earth is one of the powers that is weakest in females, and nobody, in 13 books, has ever done it. That is what I mean by creating new tactics. Even easier is to open a gateway to 1,000 feet straight up over the command post of your enemies and turn them into artillery for your side. However, nobody in Randland is doing anything like that.

Like I said, C armored troops would be much more effective, and more resistant to the OP battlefield tactics that have been used to date than the current forces.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1646 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1109 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 578 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1033 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1107 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 532 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1003 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1175 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 968 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 575 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 981 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1134 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 492 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1233 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1029 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1000 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1007 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1021 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1099 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 948 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1010 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 917 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1046 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 885 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 895 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1002 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 889 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 860 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 637 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 980 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 946 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 931 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1044 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 903 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 874 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 914 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 996 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 978 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 933 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 849 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 994 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 867 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1033 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1200 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 885 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 858 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1037 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 894 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 896 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1049 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 904 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 874 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 987 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 555 Views

Reply to Message