Active Users:733 Time:18/08/2026 03:02:26 AM
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM

Oh, ok. I always assumed the levels were evenly distributed. Do you know if there exists a large collection of channeler strengths, enough to make a plot?

I guess making a comprehensive list would be like the mother of all those riddles where you get information like "The man in house number two drinks wine" and "The French officer is the neighbour of the man who has a dog".

I'm sure a full list of channelers exists in RJ's notes. I doubt we'll ever see it.

And I don't see why you would want to make a curve. Its not like what RJ said was a hypothesis that has to be proved. This is his world. His word is law.

If RJ said it, why are we discussing it? Do you have a link to the quote?

We're having this discussion because Shannow is a doofus.

Here are the quotes:
For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the "present day" sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.

Regarding the percentage of women who could test for the shawl, it would be 62.5% of the bellcurve. I'll leave the maths to you for an idle moment. The question doesn't really apply to men, since the Black Tower accepts anyone who can learn to channel, but if the White Tower limits were applied, it would be roughly 65.4% of the bellcurve. Although, considering the effectiveness question, they should probably set it at the same 62.5%. Again, the maths are all yours. Regarding the levels of male strength, while the weakest man and the weakest woman would be roughly equivalent, you might say that there are several levels of male strength on top of the female levels. Remember to integrate this with what I've said elsewhere about effectiveness, though.


These two quotes tell us that there was a bell curve distribution in strength, not strength levels. And the way RJ referred to "the" bell curve in the second quote (which he had previously only used to describe the AoL channelers) makes it clear there's only one bell curve.

There's also this:

LUCKERS
Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).
MARIA SIMONS
Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.


Again, strength in the Power is the "it" in Maria's answer, and obviously most channelers would fall at the mid point.

But really, 67.5% of the channeling population strong enough to be Aes Sedai? Aren't they sending away a majority of the novices and accepted because they aren't strong enough? Or is it because the majority don't have "what it takes to be Aes Sedai"?

It is 62.5%. And the reason we don't see large numbers of Aes Sedai is that they haven't been actively recruiting, like the Black Tower. As we see with the 1000 novices who join the Rebels in response to Egwene's call (only about 200 of them are strong enough to be Aes Sedai), the subset of the population interested in becoming Aes Sedai is a bad sampling for the subset of the population that can become Aes Sedai. And the traditional Tower consisted mostly of women exclusively from the first type of sample.
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 3233 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 941 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 1136 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1440 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 1608 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 1089 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 1371 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1725 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1381 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1463 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1421 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1434 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 1397 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 1288 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 1453 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 850 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1511 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 1256 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1621 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 1208 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 1352 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 1318 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 1332 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 1410 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 1358 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 1438 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 1351 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 1319 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 1238 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 1290 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 1279 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 1204 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 1336 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 1298 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 1515 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 1387 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 1385 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 1595 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 1140 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 1242 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 1385 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 1160 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 1167 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 1157 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 1360 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 1133 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 1263 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 1337 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 1129 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 1374 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 1106 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 1146 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 1099 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 1389 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 1256 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 1152 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 1393 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 1212 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 1233 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 1204 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1664 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 1236 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 1320 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 1183 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 1189 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 1186 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 1293 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 1134 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 1173 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 1168 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 1315 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 1343 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 1161 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 1132 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 1131 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 1131 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 1387 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 1123 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 1184 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 1187 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 1384 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 1094 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 1214 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 1166 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 1187 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 1300 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 1143 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 1168 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 1142 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 1090 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 1161 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1816 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 1248 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 1274 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 1161 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 1358 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 1186 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 1330 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 1200 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 1146 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 1327 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 1282 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 1165 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 1262 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 1186 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 1206 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 1141 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 1164 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 1168 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 1307 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 1357 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 840 Views

Reply to Message