Active Users:293 Time:29/04/2024 06:46:34 PM
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. Shannow Send a noteboard - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM
Yeah, that's all wrong. For one thing, RJ said strength is distributed over a bell curve, not strength levels. You're plotting the wrong data points.

That said, obviously each level corresponds to a range on the strength scale (whatever it was in RJ's, we can take it to be 1-100 and it will still work the same). The 21 levels are distributed over this scale. We don't know if each level represents an equal interval in the strength scale, but assuming we do, we'd expect a peak around 10/11, which is where you find it. However, you also need to note that the sampling in that list is atrocious. We tend to see and hear more about stronger Aes Sedai and very little about women too weak to become AS. That definitely causes skewing. Plus, the list is very subjective, and tries to make quantitative differences between "strong" and "very strong" and such terms.

Oh, ok. I always assumed the levels were evenly distributed. Do you know if there exists a large collection of channeler strengths, enough to make a plot?

I guess making a comprehensive list would be like the mother of all those riddles where you get information like "The man in house number two drinks wine" and "The French officer is the neighbour of the man who has a dog".

RJ spoke of the same bell curve holding now. He said strength was distributed over a bell curve. That 67.5% of channelers in that curve would be strong enough to be Aes Sedai. That this is true only in the modern age, since in the AoL, anyone could become Aes Sedai. There's no doubt at all that its the same bell curve.


If RJ said it, why are we discussing it? Do you have a link to the quote?

But really, 67.5% of the channeling population strong enough to be Aes Sedai? Aren't they sending away a majority of the novices and accepted because they aren't strong enough? Or is it because the majority don't have "what it takes to be Aes Sedai"?


Firstly, channeling strength IS linked to genetics. It is blatantly incorrect to say that it is solely linked to the soul.

In fact, it is linked to both the soul and the body. If Lews Therin's soul was reborn into a body that does not have sufficient strength, he will be weaker in the One Power than in his previous incarnation.

So yes, a weaker channeling gene pool will serve to reduce average strength.

Secondly, great work in applying a Bell Curve to the estimated channeler strengths of known channelers. It indeed clearly shows that the curve now spikes way lower than it did in the Age of Legends.

Furthermore, RJ has confirmed that 62.5% of female channelers are strong enough to pass the Aes Sedai test (meaning they are as strong as Daigian or stronger). This means that only 12.5% of channelers lie between Daigian and the average strength channeler.

We know that Daigian is roughly one third as strong as Moiraine. And we know that Lanfear is FAR more than twice as strong as Moiraine (meaning that Moiraine has to lie below the average strength channeler).

All of this tells us that all modern Aes Sedai come from less than 12.5% of the total female channeling population. This HAS to be the case, because if 37.5% lie below Daigian, then 12.5% lie between Daigian and the average strength, and if Moiraine lies BELOW the average strength, then all modern sisters who fall between Daigian and Moiraine come from LESS than 12.5% of the total channeling population.

There it is. Irrefutable, if you believe in the Bell Curve hypothesis.
This message last edited by Shannow on 28/10/2012 at 06:00:30 PM
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 2675 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 650 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 902 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1003 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 944 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 670 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 970 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1169 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1006 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1057 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1029 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1024 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 943 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 889 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 981 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 574 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1076 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 787 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1100 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 847 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 933 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 882 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 933 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 887 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 940 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 893 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 820 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 819 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 830 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 884 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 885 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 779 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 897 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 869 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 923 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 977 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 681 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 915 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 814 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 849 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 857 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 775 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 755 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 750 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 936 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 702 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 849 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 942 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 714 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 817 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 738 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 750 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 731 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 856 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 848 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 746 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 797 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 771 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 777 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 803 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1150 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 818 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 890 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 811 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 788 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 759 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 755 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 770 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 770 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 804 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 809 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 829 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 781 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 762 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 726 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 730 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 869 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 738 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 796 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 751 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 879 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 733 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 771 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 735 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 684 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 878 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 726 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 820 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 741 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 688 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 777 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1306 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 755 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 782 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 764 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 835 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 780 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 810 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 782 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 746 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 834 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 709 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 746 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 773 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 792 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 815 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 766 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 757 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 758 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 905 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 892 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 566 Views

Reply to Message