Active Users:925 Time:02/07/2026 04:10:51 PM
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM

Oh, ok. I always assumed the levels were evenly distributed. Do you know if there exists a large collection of channeler strengths, enough to make a plot?

I guess making a comprehensive list would be like the mother of all those riddles where you get information like "The man in house number two drinks wine" and "The French officer is the neighbour of the man who has a dog".

I'm sure a full list of channelers exists in RJ's notes. I doubt we'll ever see it.

And I don't see why you would want to make a curve. Its not like what RJ said was a hypothesis that has to be proved. This is his world. His word is law.

If RJ said it, why are we discussing it? Do you have a link to the quote?

We're having this discussion because Shannow is a doofus.

Here are the quotes:
For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the "present day" sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.

Regarding the percentage of women who could test for the shawl, it would be 62.5% of the bellcurve. I'll leave the maths to you for an idle moment. The question doesn't really apply to men, since the Black Tower accepts anyone who can learn to channel, but if the White Tower limits were applied, it would be roughly 65.4% of the bellcurve. Although, considering the effectiveness question, they should probably set it at the same 62.5%. Again, the maths are all yours. Regarding the levels of male strength, while the weakest man and the weakest woman would be roughly equivalent, you might say that there are several levels of male strength on top of the female levels. Remember to integrate this with what I've said elsewhere about effectiveness, though.


These two quotes tell us that there was a bell curve distribution in strength, not strength levels. And the way RJ referred to "the" bell curve in the second quote (which he had previously only used to describe the AoL channelers) makes it clear there's only one bell curve.

There's also this:

LUCKERS
Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).
MARIA SIMONS
Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.


Again, strength in the Power is the "it" in Maria's answer, and obviously most channelers would fall at the mid point.

But really, 67.5% of the channeling population strong enough to be Aes Sedai? Aren't they sending away a majority of the novices and accepted because they aren't strong enough? Or is it because the majority don't have "what it takes to be Aes Sedai"?

It is 62.5%. And the reason we don't see large numbers of Aes Sedai is that they haven't been actively recruiting, like the Black Tower. As we see with the 1000 novices who join the Rebels in response to Egwene's call (only about 200 of them are strong enough to be Aes Sedai), the subset of the population interested in becoming Aes Sedai is a bad sampling for the subset of the population that can become Aes Sedai. And the traditional Tower consisted mostly of women exclusively from the first type of sample.
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 3190 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 913 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 1103 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1418 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 1541 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 1063 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 1330 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1684 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1362 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1422 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1400 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1412 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 1377 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 1259 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 1428 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 821 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1483 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 1219 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1587 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 1186 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 1327 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 1289 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 1312 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 1377 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 1334 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 1396 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 1317 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 1287 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 1210 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 1264 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 1258 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 1180 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 1310 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 1277 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 1470 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 1359 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 1317 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 1542 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 1116 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 1217 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 1351 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 1132 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 1144 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 1132 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 1336 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 1113 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 1239 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 1313 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 1101 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 1327 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 1086 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 1126 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 1073 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 1348 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 1228 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 1129 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 1339 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 1189 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 1205 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 1180 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1625 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 1213 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 1294 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 1164 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 1163 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 1153 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 1246 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 1107 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 1151 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 1145 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 1272 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 1304 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 1135 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 1114 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 1111 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 1113 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 1341 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 1099 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 1160 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 1170 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 1347 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 1072 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 1190 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 1142 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 1143 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 1274 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 1116 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 1145 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 1118 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 1063 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 1138 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1776 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 1197 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 1226 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 1131 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 1321 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 1169 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 1285 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 1164 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 1121 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 1285 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 1240 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 1137 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 1238 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 1161 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 1182 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 1118 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 1131 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 1142 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 1283 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 1317 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 815 Views

Reply to Message