Oh, ok. I always assumed the levels were evenly distributed. Do you know if there exists a large collection of channeler strengths, enough to make a plot?
I guess making a comprehensive list would be like the mother of all those riddles where you get information like "The man in house number two drinks wine" and "The French officer is the neighbour of the man who has a dog".
I'm sure a full list of channelers exists in RJ's notes. I doubt we'll ever see it.
And I don't see why you would want to make a curve. Its not like what RJ said was a hypothesis that has to be proved. This is his world. His word is law.
If RJ said it, why are we discussing it? Do you have a link to the quote?
We're having this discussion because Shannow is a doofus.
Here are the quotes:
For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the "present day" sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.
Regarding the percentage of women who could test for the shawl, it would be 62.5% of the bellcurve. I'll leave the maths to you for an idle moment. The question doesn't really apply to men, since the Black Tower accepts anyone who can learn to channel, but if the White Tower limits were applied, it would be roughly 65.4% of the bellcurve. Although, considering the effectiveness question, they should probably set it at the same 62.5%. Again, the maths are all yours. Regarding the levels of male strength, while the weakest man and the weakest woman would be roughly equivalent, you might say that there are several levels of male strength on top of the female levels. Remember to integrate this with what I've said elsewhere about effectiveness, though.
These two quotes tell us that there was a bell curve distribution in strength, not strength levels. And the way RJ referred to "the" bell curve in the second quote (which he had previously only used to describe the AoL channelers) makes it clear there's only one bell curve.
There's also this:
LUCKERS
Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).
MARIA SIMONS
Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.
Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).
MARIA SIMONS
Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.
Again, strength in the Power is the "it" in Maria's answer, and obviously most channelers would fall at the mid point.
But really, 67.5% of the channeling population strong enough to be Aes Sedai? Aren't they sending away a majority of the novices and accepted because they aren't strong enough? Or is it because the majority don't have "what it takes to be Aes Sedai"?
It is 62.5%. And the reason we don't see large numbers of Aes Sedai is that they haven't been actively recruiting, like the Black Tower. As we see with the 1000 novices who join the Rebels in response to Egwene's call (only about 200 of them are strong enough to be Aes Sedai), the subset of the population interested in becoming Aes Sedai is a bad sampling for the subset of the population that can become Aes Sedai. And the traditional Tower consisted mostly of women exclusively from the first type of sample.
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications
- 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM
3074 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM*
- 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM
841 Views
Androl did. *NM*
- 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM
1052 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing?
- 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM
1342 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information.
- 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM
1374 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications
- 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM
1553 Views
Travelling
- 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM
1332 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine
- 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM
1341 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine
- 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM
1318 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine
- 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM
1192 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common
- 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM
1108 Views
How strong Pevara is...
- 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM
1465 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30...
- 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM
1117 Views
Agreed
- 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM
1257 Views
That was disproved long ago...
- 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM
1262 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong'
- 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM
1266 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last.
- 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM
1273 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves
- 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM
1200 Views
The Bell Curve explained...
- 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM
1199 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained...
- 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM
1183 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained...
- 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM
1101 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained...
- 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM
1244 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained...
- 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM
1209 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained...
- 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM
1320 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same
- 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM
1387 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same...
- 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM
1051 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same...
- 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM
1133 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes:
- 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM
1228 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes:
- 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM
1067 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies.
- 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM
1073 Views
Re: I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies.
- 28/10/2012 07:44:02 PM
1180 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck.
- 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM
1063 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck.
- 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM
1270 Views
So what's your conclusion?
- 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM
1049 Views
you do realize that is an impossible question to answer from the books right?
- 29/10/2012 07:50:02 PM
1203 Views
Excellent points...
- 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM
1029 Views
Re: Excellent points...
- 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM
1217 Views
You seem confused.
- 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM
1020 Views
Re: You seem confused.
- 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM
1058 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area
- 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM
1011 Views
Re: You seem confused.
- 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM
1227 Views
Re: You seem confused.
- 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM
1163 Views
He drew graphs!
- 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM
1064 Views
He drew graphs!
- 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM
1064 Views
Re: Excellent points...
- 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM
1122 Views
Re: Excellent points...
- 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM
1101 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes:
- 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM
1073 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes:
- 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM
1082 Views
Huh?
- 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM
1133 Views
Re: Huh?
- 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM
1039 Views
You don't seem to know what random means...
- 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM
1075 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means...
- 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM
1080 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop
- 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM
1150 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop
- 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM
1179 Views
Geography alone can do this
- 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM
1068 Views
Here's why its not random...
- 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM
1042 Views
Re: Here's why its not random...
- 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM
1230 Views
Re: Here's why its not random...
- 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM
1032 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means...
- 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM
1005 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means...
- 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM
1123 Views
Why must there be a mechanism?
- 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM
1040 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism?
- 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM
1030 Views
Nope...
- 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM
1199 Views
Re: Nope...
- 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM
1049 Views
Oh my...
- 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM
1085 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah!
- 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM
1042 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results
- 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM
987 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results
- 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM
1063 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same
- 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM
1079 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories
- 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM
1125 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories
- 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM
1061 Views
The curve hasn't shifted!
- 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM
1210 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength.
- 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM
1103 Views
Re: The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength.
- 28/10/2012 07:27:26 PM
1057 Views
There is not a single quote in the series that states Moiraine is less than half the strength
- 28/10/2012 10:31:28 PM
1113 Views
How is this fact?
- 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM
1181 Views
Re: How is this fact?
- 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM
1088 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then...
- 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM
1071 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then...
- 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM
1172 Views
Are you blind man?
- 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM
1090 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted!
- 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM
1080 Views
Well the most obvious thing is that RJ was quoted on the subject any number of times
- 28/10/2012 11:34:18 PM
1143 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking
- 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM
1203 Views
