Active Users:978 Time:18/08/2026 03:57:27 AM
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM

Oh, ok. I always assumed the levels were evenly distributed. Do you know if there exists a large collection of channeler strengths, enough to make a plot?

I guess making a comprehensive list would be like the mother of all those riddles where you get information like "The man in house number two drinks wine" and "The French officer is the neighbour of the man who has a dog".

I'm sure a full list of channelers exists in RJ's notes. I doubt we'll ever see it.

And I don't see why you would want to make a curve. Its not like what RJ said was a hypothesis that has to be proved. This is his world. His word is law.

If RJ said it, why are we discussing it? Do you have a link to the quote?

We're having this discussion because Shannow is a doofus.

Here are the quotes:
For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the "present day" sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.

Regarding the percentage of women who could test for the shawl, it would be 62.5% of the bellcurve. I'll leave the maths to you for an idle moment. The question doesn't really apply to men, since the Black Tower accepts anyone who can learn to channel, but if the White Tower limits were applied, it would be roughly 65.4% of the bellcurve. Although, considering the effectiveness question, they should probably set it at the same 62.5%. Again, the maths are all yours. Regarding the levels of male strength, while the weakest man and the weakest woman would be roughly equivalent, you might say that there are several levels of male strength on top of the female levels. Remember to integrate this with what I've said elsewhere about effectiveness, though.


These two quotes tell us that there was a bell curve distribution in strength, not strength levels. And the way RJ referred to "the" bell curve in the second quote (which he had previously only used to describe the AoL channelers) makes it clear there's only one bell curve.

There's also this:

LUCKERS
Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).
MARIA SIMONS
Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.


Again, strength in the Power is the "it" in Maria's answer, and obviously most channelers would fall at the mid point.

But really, 67.5% of the channeling population strong enough to be Aes Sedai? Aren't they sending away a majority of the novices and accepted because they aren't strong enough? Or is it because the majority don't have "what it takes to be Aes Sedai"?

It is 62.5%. And the reason we don't see large numbers of Aes Sedai is that they haven't been actively recruiting, like the Black Tower. As we see with the 1000 novices who join the Rebels in response to Egwene's call (only about 200 of them are strong enough to be Aes Sedai), the subset of the population interested in becoming Aes Sedai is a bad sampling for the subset of the population that can become Aes Sedai. And the traditional Tower consisted mostly of women exclusively from the first type of sample.
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 3234 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 942 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 1136 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1442 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 1610 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 1091 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 1372 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1727 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1383 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1464 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1424 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1436 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 1399 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 1291 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 1454 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 850 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1513 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 1258 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1623 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 1209 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 1353 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 1319 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 1334 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 1413 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 1360 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 1440 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 1352 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 1320 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 1239 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 1292 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 1280 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 1207 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 1339 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 1300 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 1519 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 1389 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 1387 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 1598 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 1142 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 1244 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 1387 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 1162 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 1169 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 1159 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 1361 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 1135 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 1266 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 1339 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 1131 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 1376 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 1108 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 1148 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 1101 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 1391 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 1257 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 1153 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 1396 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 1215 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 1234 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 1206 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1666 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 1238 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 1322 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 1185 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 1192 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 1187 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 1295 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 1136 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 1175 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 1169 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 1317 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 1344 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 1164 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 1135 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 1133 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 1133 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 1389 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 1125 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 1186 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 1189 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 1387 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 1096 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 1215 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 1167 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 1188 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 1302 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 1145 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 1170 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 1145 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 1091 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 1164 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1819 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 1250 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 1276 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 1163 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 1360 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 1189 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 1333 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 1202 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 1148 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 1329 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 1284 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 1168 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 1264 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 1187 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 1208 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 1142 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 1167 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 1170 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 1309 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 1358 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 840 Views

Reply to Message