Active Users:880 Time:13/05/2026 01:35:25 PM
Re: About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: Dunstan Send a noteboard - 11/12/2012 11:36:51 PM

As for the fight with Asmodean, we have confirmation that sa'angreal increase your strength by a set amount. They not multipliers.


Never heard that, where's it from?

Because I clearly remember some character are another saying that angreal were multipliers.

Edit: was able to find this...

"(BYU Stormleader Dinner — Matt Hatch)

Matt: Question—The Choedan Kal, does it amplify your power? Is it a limited, for example, if I have a certain amount of power does it give me 10x what I have, or is it a certain amount of power I can access?

Brandon: One of the things I’ve been doing when I answer questions is that I’ve been saying that this is my understanding and putting an asterisk at the bottom that is a – I am speaking from my understanding and not from specific knowledge from the notes, meaning yes I am probably right but these are the questions I could be wrong on...this one my understanding is that it is a reservoir of power. It is not necessarily a magnification. A very weak person with a very powerful sa’angreal is very powerful. I’m pretty sure on that one, but I will add the asterisk just in case. If you send me an email, I can go back and look to make sure. But I’m reasonably sure on that one, the reasons being things that are talked about in the notes mixed with the way angreal and sa’angreal worked previously in the books mixed with two specific things that he talked about in the notes when people using angreal and sa’angreal after they become very weak or after they are weak."

But as he seems to be working by memroy, I think that gets over redden by the characters in the books, and even if not, he's still talking about sa’angreals, and to be more exact The Choedan Kal.

Angreals at least have been said to be multipliers, and just going by that quote of BS, I'd be more inclined to just say he was mistaken about the whole thing.
This message last edited by Dunstan on 11/12/2012 at 11:45:10 PM
Reply to message
I really hate to bring up strength in the OP, but thankfully it doesn't regard Egwene or any women. - 04/12/2012 06:01:45 AM 1943 Views
My thoughts - 04/12/2012 07:15:44 AM 1350 Views
90 is REALLY high - 04/12/2012 07:25:15 AM 1312 Views
Couple of things ... **reminder that this is a lot of speculation** - 04/12/2012 04:29:50 PM 1311 Views
Narishma is definitely stronger, you're right. - 07/12/2012 03:00:53 AM 1199 Views
He was stronger than Aginor in order to channel the power of the Eye - 07/12/2012 03:00:10 PM 1234 Views
No I don't think so - 07/12/2012 04:13:48 PM 1097 Views
I'd say more than 80 - 07/12/2012 07:07:32 PM 1038 Views
81 then - 07/12/2012 08:11:34 PM 964 Views
and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 09:13:42 PM 1025 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 07/12/2012 10:14:53 PM 1084 Views
there were more like MILLIONS of Forsaken during these times - 07/12/2012 10:30:34 PM 1055 Views
Re: and that's just YOUR theory Sidius - 28/12/2012 08:44:51 PM 887 Views
Aginors defeat could be a result of multiple factors. So can Ishmaels - 07/12/2012 01:24:18 PM 1111 Views
Regardless, Rand was clearly in the same strength category when Aginor and he faced off - 07/12/2012 03:03:04 PM 1107 Views
I disagree. - 07/12/2012 06:55:43 PM 996 Views
Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:12:44 PM 1047 Views
Re: Aginor burned out trying to use the Eye in the real world - 07/12/2012 07:51:37 PM 1002 Views
he faced Asmodean strength for strength before Rahvin - 07/12/2012 09:23:42 PM 1102 Views
Just to be a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:17:11 PM 929 Views
you don't actually have to tell us all you are a bitch - 07/12/2012 10:36:25 PM 1091 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2012 06:22:49 AM 923 Views
think youre misjudgjng the benefits of the link. they dont have to add up to 90. - 07/12/2012 12:34:59 PM 1047 Views
There is also no why to tell if Flinn hit Demandred with all the strength available to him either - 07/12/2012 03:05:38 PM 1024 Views
the "circle" was stronger but the individuals weren't *NM* - 07/12/2012 06:58:38 PM 607 Views
that's what I just said *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:23:34 PM 545 Views
that was not clear *NM* - 07/12/2012 07:43:54 PM 641 Views
*shrug* - 07/12/2012 09:25:00 PM 926 Views
Re: *shrug* - 10/12/2012 11:27:42 PM 1019 Views
If I had said the individuals in the circle added to Dmandreds strength perhaps - 11/12/2012 03:28:23 AM 1063 Views
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and - 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM 978 Views
whatever ... didn't think it was necessary ... and with that I'm done - 11/12/2012 09:16:03 PM 942 Views
- 17/12/2012 11:22:55 PM 1246 Views
About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 08/12/2012 12:37:38 AM 1175 Views
Perhaps - 08/12/2012 01:01:21 AM 989 Views
Re: Perhaps - 08/12/2012 02:06:39 AM 1058 Views
Like I said ... Could be - 08/12/2012 02:33:43 AM 1035 Views
I disagree... - 08/12/2012 04:53:09 AM 990 Views
Re: I disagree... - 08/12/2012 05:20:08 AM 925 Views
I disagree again! - 08/12/2012 05:49:15 AM 992 Views
Probably - 08/12/2012 02:46:15 PM 1036 Views
Re: Probably - 09/12/2012 07:51:59 PM 1038 Views
Not really - 09/12/2012 10:13:07 PM 965 Views
Re: Not really - 10/12/2012 01:05:54 AM 996 Views
Re: Not really - 13/12/2012 03:58:48 PM 1068 Views
I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 08/12/2012 06:18:45 AM 1045 Views
We're essentially saying the same thing now - 08/12/2012 02:37:17 PM 997 Views
Re: I don't think the Forsaken are good examples - 28/12/2012 08:08:21 PM 913 Views
Always thought the forsaken didn't really know much about Rand - 08/12/2012 02:38:08 AM 1066 Views
And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 02:43:15 AM 972 Views
Re: And they had plenty of spies around him and clearly knew that he managed - 08/12/2012 05:34:54 AM 1050 Views
Who can say. Graendal wraps them so deep in compulsion that she can dig - 08/12/2012 05:42:39 AM 1037 Views
Oops, double post. *NM* - 08/12/2012 09:34:36 AM 616 Views
Re: About Rand's strength... an important quote is being ignored: - 11/12/2012 11:36:51 PM 1036 Views
Re: Rand v Aginor - 16/12/2012 01:46:08 PM 981 Views
Not a bad theory and I've read it before - 16/12/2012 07:42:31 PM 926 Views

Reply to Message