Active Users:472 Time:15/12/2025 12:27:37 PM
Wait! Datakim Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
Wait!

I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.

That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.

We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1737 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1148 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1144 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1156 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1077 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 968 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1071 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 976 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 965 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 926 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 933 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 892 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 917 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 909 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 1029 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 930 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 1028 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 948 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 1004 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 947 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 1001 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 899 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 1018 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 1034 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 984 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1076 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 872 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 1012 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 496 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 944 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 952 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 906 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 510 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 884 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 507 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 902 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 859 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 1013 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 961 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 959 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 964 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 965 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 943 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 1013 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 899 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 1014 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 846 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 955 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 920 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 943 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 951 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 880 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 968 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 913 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 849 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 1013 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 966 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 969 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 909 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 945 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 857 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 871 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 1039 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 879 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 876 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 964 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 939 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 935 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 997 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 863 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 898 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 950 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 882 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 1033 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 1004 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 939 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 965 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 867 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 1002 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 939 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 955 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 887 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 955 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1130 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1262 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 845 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 891 Views

Reply to Message