Wait!
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1764 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1173 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1005 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1098 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1008 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
999 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
956 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1062 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
960 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1065 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
977 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1035 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
969 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1029 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1471 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1070 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1049 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
511 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
966 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
522 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
906 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1046 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
998 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
996 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
991 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1003 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
972 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1044 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
938 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
943 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
900 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1043 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
881 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
951 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
981 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
983 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
912 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
994 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
955 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
879 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1043 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
996 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1005 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1071 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
904 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
906 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
997 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
974 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
967 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
891 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
933 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
989 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
916 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1073 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1035 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1035 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
971 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
999 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
905 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1039 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
982 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
916 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
992 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1044 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
911 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1211 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
956 Views
