Wait!
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1899 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
1337 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
1150 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
1226 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
1133 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
1127 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
1098 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM
1092 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
1183 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
1107 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
1194 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
1140 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
1173 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
1099 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
1165 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1603 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
1191 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
1224 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
578 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
1096 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
586 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
1037 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
1181 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
1150 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
1126 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
1120 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
1133 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
1110 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
1234 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
1068 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
1062 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
1027 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
1206 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
1052 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
1087 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
1103 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
1116 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
1050 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
1130 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
1096 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
1012 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
1164 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
1139 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
1154 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
1203 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
1047 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
1033 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
1124 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
1096 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
1087 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
1024 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
1063 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
1145 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
1047 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
1214 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1158 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
1158 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
1093 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
1135 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
1051 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
1165 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
1110 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
1050 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
1120 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
1175 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
1041 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1333 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
1084 Views
